Patient Preferences for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Literature Review
- PMID: 27461276
- PMCID: PMC5250672
- DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0185-9
Patient Preferences for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Objectives: Since the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants (NOACs), an additional treatment option, apart from VKAs, has become available for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For various reasons, it is important to consider patients' preferences regarding type of medication, particularly in view of the established relationship between preferences towards treatment, associated burden of treatment, and treatment adherence. This review aimed to systematically analyse the scientific literature assessing the preferences of AF patients with regard to long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment.
Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE databases (from 1980 to 2015), added records from reference lists of publications found, and conducted a systematic review based on all identified publications. Outcomes of interest included any quantitative information regarding the opinions or preferences of AF patients towards OAC treatment, ideally specified according to different clinical or convenience attributes describing different OAC treatment options.
Results: Overall, 27 publications describing the results of studies conducted in 12 different countries were included in our review. Among these, 16 studies analysed patient preferences towards OACs in general. These studies predominantly assessed which benefits (mainly lower stroke risk) AF patients would require to tolerate harms (mainly higher bleeding risk) associated with an OAC. Most studies showed that patients were willing to accept higher bleeding risks if a certain threshold in stroke risk reduction could be reached. Nevertheless, most of the publications also showed that the preferences of AF patients towards OACs may differ from the perspective of clinical guidelines or the perspective of physicians. The remaining 11 studies included in our review assessed the preferences of AF patients towards specific OAC medication options, namely NOACs versus VKAs. Our review showed that AF patients prefer easy-to-administer treatments, such as treatments that are applied once daily without any food/drug interactions and without the need for bridging and frequent blood controls.
Conclusion: Stroke risk reduction and a moderate increase in the risk of bleeding are the most important attributes for an AF patient when deciding whether they are for or against OAC treatment. If different anticoagulation options have similar clinical characteristics, convenience attributes matter to patients. In this review, AF patients favour attribute levels that describe NOAC treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with Ethical StandardsConflicts of interestThomas Wilke has received honoraria from various pharmaceutical companies, including Novo Nordisk, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi-Aventis; Thomas Kohlmann has received honoraria from Bayer Vital GmbH, Germany; Rupert Bauersachs has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Bayer Vital GmbH, Germany, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Sabine Bauer and Sabrina Müller have no conflicts of interest to declare.FundingThis study was financially supported by Bayer Vital GmbH, Germany.Author ContributionsThomas Wilke participated in the conception, planning and interpretation of this study, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version. He also acts as overall guarantor for this work.Sabine Bauer participated in the planning and analysis of the data, critically reviewed the draft manuscript, and approved the final version.Sabrina Müller participated in the conception and planning of the work, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.Thomas Kohlmann participated in the conception of the work, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.Rupert Bauersachs participated in the conception of the work, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
-
Physician and Patient Preferences for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy Decision Making in Atrial Fibrillation: Results From a National Best-Worst Scaling Survey in Türkiye.Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70038. doi: 10.1002/clc.70038. Clin Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 39654285 Free PMC article.
-
Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 21;10(10):CD013504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013504.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34674223 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Rationale and design of PROACT Xa: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with a mechanical On-X Aortic Heart Valve.Am Heart J. 2020 Sep;227:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 25. Am Heart J. 2020. PMID: 32693197 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Anticoagulants Preference in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis or Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 15;8(4):404. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040404. Healthcare (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33076509 Free PMC article.
-
Patient perceptions of anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation according to region and age: an exploratory analysis from the RE-SONANCE study.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Nov;52(4):1195-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02450-2. Epub 2021 Apr 30. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021. PMID: 33929686 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Feb 14;24(Suppl A):A42-A55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab152. eCollection 2022 Feb. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022. PMID: 35185408 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Dec;18(6):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0293-0. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018. PMID: 30132140 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical