Patient selection and perioperative outcomes are similar between targeted and nontargeted hospitals (in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
- PMID: 27462004
- PMCID: PMC5253340
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.066
Patient selection and perioperative outcomes are similar between targeted and nontargeted hospitals (in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Abstract
Objective: The targeted vascular module in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) consists of self-selected hospitals that choose to collect extra clinical details for better risk adjustment and improved procedure-specific outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare patient selection and outcomes between targeted and nontargeted hospitals in the NSQIP regarding the operative management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
Methods: We identified all patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open AAA repair from 2011 to 2013 and compared cases by whether the operation took place in a targeted or nontargeted hospital. EVAR and open repair as well as intact and ruptured aneurysms were evaluated separately. Only variables contained in both modules were used to evaluate rupture status and operation type. All thoracoabdominal aneurysms were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed for intact and ruptured EVAR and open repair grouped by complexity, defined as visceral involvement in open repair and a compilation of concomitant procedures for EVAR. Multivariable models were developed to identify effect of hospital type on mortality.
Results: There were 17,651 AAA repairs identified. After exclusion of aneurysms involving the thoracic aorta (n = 352), there were 1600 open AAA repairs at targeted hospitals (21% ruptured) and 2725 at nontargeted hospitals (19% ruptured) and 4986 EVARs performed at targeted hospitals (6.7% ruptured) and 7988 at nontargeted hospitals (5.2% ruptured). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality rates between targeted and nontargeted hospitals for intact aneurysms (EVAR noncomplex, 1.8% vs 1.4% [P = .07]; open repair noncomplex, 4.2% vs 4.5% [P = .7]; EVAR complex, 5.0% vs 3.2% [P = .3]; open repair complex, 8.0% vs 6.0% [P = .2]). For ruptured aneurysms, again there was no difference in mortality between the targeted and nontargeted hospitals (EVAR noncomplex, 23% vs 25% [P = .4]; open repair noncomplex, 38% vs 34% [P = .2]; EVAR complex, 29% vs 33% [P = 1.0]; open repair complex, 27% vs 41% [P = .09]). Multivariable analysis further demonstrated that having an operation at a targeted vs nontargeted hospital had no impact on mortality for both intact and ruptured aneurysms (odds ratio, 1.1 [0.9-1.4] and 1.0 [0.8-1.3], respectively).
Conclusions: This analysis highlights the similarities between targeted and nontargeted hospitals within the NSQIP for AAA operative management and suggests that data from the targeted NSQIP, in terms of AAA management, are generalizable to all NSQIP hospitals.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes for symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.J Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.055. Epub 2016 Apr 14. J Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 27146791 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of and risk factors for bowel ischemia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1384-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.045. Epub 2016 Jul 27. J Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 27475466 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of endovascular and open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in elderly patients.J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.119. J Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28216354
-
Current insights in endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.EuroIntervention. 2011 Nov;7(7):852-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I7A133. EuroIntervention. 2011. PMID: 22082581 Review.
-
Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis of Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.023. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 31932143
Cited by
-
Complications and failure-to-rescue after pancreatectomy and hospital participation in the targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry.Surgery. 2023 Nov;174(5):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.023. Epub 2023 Aug 22. Surgery. 2023. PMID: 37612210 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary mortality after emergent open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):39-47.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.059. Epub 2020 Apr 29. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32361067 Free PMC article.
-
Early reintervention after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with high mortality.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):433-440.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.104. Epub 2017 Sep 21. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 28943011 Free PMC article.
-
In-hospital versus postdischarge major adverse events within 30 days following lower extremity revascularization.J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):482-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.207. Epub 2018 Oct 6. J Vasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30301689 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment outcomes in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.081. Epub 2018 Mar 22. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29576404 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Woo K, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Hallett JW, Davies MG, Beck A, Upchurch GR, Jr, et al. Regional quality groups in the Society for Vascular Surgery(R) Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(3):884–90. - PubMed
-
- Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stey AM, Russell MM, Ko CY, Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Gibbons MM. Clinical registries and quality measurement in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2015;157(2):381–95. - PubMed
-
- Information PA. [cited 2015 July 21]; Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instr....
-
- Physician Qulaity Reporting System: Appendix A: Individual Measures List. M2S. [cited 2015 July 21]; Available from: http://www.m2s.com/wp-content/uploads/2015-M2S-PQRS-Service.pdf.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical