Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 12:7:972.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00972. eCollection 2016.

Genotypic Variation in a Breeding Population of Yellow Sweet Clover (Melilotus officinalis)

Affiliations

Genotypic Variation in a Breeding Population of Yellow Sweet Clover (Melilotus officinalis)

Kai Luo et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Yellow sweet clover is a widely spread legume species that has potential to be used as a forage crop in Western China. However, limited information is available on the genetic variation for herbage yield, key morphological traits, and coumarin content. In this study, 40 half sib (HS) families of M. officinalis were evaluated for genotypic variation and phenotypic and genotypic correlation for the traits: LS (leaf to stem ratio), SV (spring vigor), LA (leaf area), PH (plant height), DW (herbage dry weight), SD (stem diameter), SN (stem number), Cou (coumarin content), SY (seed yield), across two locations, Yuzhong and Linze, in Western China. There was significant (P < 0.05) genotypic variation among the HS families for all traits. There was also significant (P < 0.05) genotype-by-environment interaction for the traits DW, PH, SD, SN, and SV. The estimates of HS family mean repeatability across two locations ranged from 0.32 for SN to 0.89 for LA. Pattern analysis generated four HS family groups where group 3 consisted of families with above average expression for DW and below average expression for Cou. The breeding population developed by polycrossing the selected HS families within group 3 will provide a significant breeding pool for M. officinalis cultivar development in China.

Keywords: correlation coefficient; coumarin; forage breeding; genotype-by-environment interactions; genotypic variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures (°C) and total monthly rainfall (mm) at Yuzhong (A) and Linze (B), respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Biplot generated using standardized Best Linear Unbiased Predictor values for eight traits measured from: the 40 half sib families, the 6 parental germplasm accessions and the 2 check cultivars of M. officinalis, evaluated across two locations Yuzhong and Linze. Components I and II account for 46 and 18% of total variation, respectively. The different symbols indicate progeny Groups 1 to 4 generated from cluster analysis. The vectors represent the traits: LS, leaf to stem ratio; LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; DW, herbage dry weight; SD, stem diameter; SN, stem number; SY, seed yield; Cou, coumarin. The 6 parental germplasm accessions: P1 to P6. Check's: CH1, experimental cultivar; CH2, cv Norgold.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biplots based on standardized Best Linear Unbiased Predictor values for seven morphological traits, measured from the 40 half sib families of M. officinalis, evaluated at Yuzhong (A) and Linze (B). In each of the biplots Components I and II account for most of the total variation. The vectors represent the traits: LS, leaf to stem ratio; LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; DW, herbage dry weight; SD, stem diameter; SN, stem number.

References

    1. Allen O. N., Allen E. K. (1981). The Leguminosae: A Source Book of Characteristics, Uses and Nodulation. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    1. Ballizany W. L., Hofmann R. W., Jahufer M. Z. Z., Barrett B. A. (2012). Genotype × environment analysis of flavonoid accumulation and morphology in white clover under contrasting field conditions. Field Crop. Res. 128, 156–166. 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.006 - DOI
    1. Basford K. E., Cooper M. (1998). Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 49, 153–174. 10.1071/A97035 - DOI
    1. Breese E. L. (1969). The measurement and significance of genotype – environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24, 27–44. 10.1038/hdy.1969.3 - DOI
    1. Breese E. L., Hayward M. D. (1972). The genetic basis of present breeding methods in forage crops. Euphytica 21, 324–336.

LinkOut - more resources