Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul 26:13:27.
doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.27. eCollection 2016.

Procedural aspects of the organization of the comprehensive European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination

Affiliations
Review

Procedural aspects of the organization of the comprehensive European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination

Danny G P Mathysen et al. J Educ Eval Health Prof. .

Abstract

The comprehensive European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) examination is one of 38 European medical specialty examinations. This review aims at disclosing the specific procedures and content of the EBOD examination. It is a descriptive study summarizing the present organization of the EBOD examination. It is the 3rd largest European postgraduate medical assessment after anaesthesiology and cardiology. The master language is English for the Part 1 written test (knowledge test with 52 modified type X multiple-choice questions) (in the past the written test was also available in French and German). Ophthalmology training of minimum 4 years in a full or associated European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) member state is a prerequisite. Problem-solving skills are tested in the Part 2 oral assessment, which is a viva of 4 subjects conducted in English with support for native language whenever feasible. The comprehensive EBOD examination is one of the leading examinations organized by UEMS European Boards or Specialist Sections from the point of number of examinees, item banking, and item contents.

Keywords: Disclosure; Europe; Language; Ophthalmology; Specialization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Example of the answer sheet for Part 1 of the comprehensive European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination where judgment is needed for each item (items displayed at the top end of the answer sheet) of any multiple-choice question (question numbers displayed at the left side of the answer sheet), whether the statement is true (T), false (F) or they don’t know the answer (D).

References

    1. Kivela T. The first European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination in Milan, June 1995: a candidate’s view. Acta Ophthalmol. 1996;74:98–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.tb00694.x. - DOI
    1. Mathysen DG, Aclimandos W, Roelant E, Wouters K, Creuzot-Garcher C, Ringens PJ, Hawlina M, Tassignon MJ. History and future of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:589–593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02422.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boorman J, Mathysen DG, Noel JL, Bloch K, Rouffet JB, Tenore A, Papalois V, Sparrow O, Goldik Z. Survey on European postgraduate medical assessments by the Council for European Medical Specialty Assessments (UEMS-CESMA) MedEdPublish. 2014;42:1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.15694/mep.2014.003.0042. - DOI
    1. Mathysen DG, Goldik Z. On quality control and the importance of European postgraduate medical specialty assessments. Med Teach. 2015;37:886–887. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1016488. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldik Z, Board of Examiners of European Diploma of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care-ESA Abandoning negative marking. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:349–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265021508003876. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources