Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;37(8):895-901.
doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.8.14570.

Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia

Thikriat S Al-Jewair  1 , Mohammad A Hamidaddin, Hamdan M Alotaibi, Nasser D Alqahtani, Sahar F Albarakati, Eman A Alkofide, Khalid A Al-Moammar
Affiliations

Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia

Thikriat S Al-Jewair et al. Saudi Med J. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the retention protocols practiced by orthodontists in Saudi Arabia, and the factors affecting retainer choice.

Methods: This cross-sectional study took place between February and March of 2015 at the College of Dentistry, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. A previously tested electronic survey of 34 items was sent to all 1,200 orthodontic members of the Saudi Orthodontic Society. The questionnaire elicited data on the subjects' demographics, orthodontic treatment practices, retention, and post-retention protocols.

Results: One hundred and sixty-seven (13.9%) responses were received during the study period. The results showed predominant use of Hawley in the maxillary arch (61.3%), and fixed lingual in the mandibular arch (58.5%). Approximately 90.3% recommended full-time maxillary removable retainer wear. Overall, orthodontists who performed fewer extractions tended to use fixed retainers, and those who performed more extractions used removable retainers (p=0.018). Interproximal enamel reduction was used by 28% of the respondents as an adjunct procedure to enhance retention. Approximately 64% practiced a post-retention phase of retainer wear. Participants who used removable retainers most commonly prescribed lifetime retention.

Conclusion: Hawley in the maxilla, and fixed lingual in the mandible were the most common retention protocols prescribed. Lifetime retention was the most common choice for participants who used removable retainers, especially when extractions were carried out.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of maxillary and mandibular retainer use by type. VFR - vacuum formed retainers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics for the student and general practitioner. 3rd ed. Chicago (IL): Year Book Publishers Inc; 1973.
    1. Moorrees CFA. The dentition of the growing child: A longitudinal study of dental development between 3 and 18 years of age. Cambridge (LK): Harvard University Press; 1959.
    1. Pratt MC, Kluemper GT, Hartsfield JK, Jr, Fardo D, Nash DA. Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:520–526. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vandevska-Radunovic V, Espeland L, Stenvik A. Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2013;14:e110–e117. - PubMed
    1. Meade MJ, Millett D. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists. J Orthod. 2013;40:318–325. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources