Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Aug;138(2):459-479.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002390.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unconventional Perfusion Flaps in Clinical Practice

Diogo Casal  1   2 , Teresa Cunha  1   2 , Diogo Pais  1   2 , Paula Videira  1   2 , Joana Coloma  1   2 , Carlos Zagalo  1   2 , Maria Angélica-Almeida  1   2 , João Goyri O'Neill  1   2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unconventional Perfusion Flaps in Clinical Practice

Diogo Casal et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Although unconventional perfusion flaps have been in clinical use since 1975, many surgeons are still deterred from using them, because of some reports of high necrosis rates.

Methods: The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles written in English, French, German, Spanish, and Portuguese on the clinical use of unconventional perfusion flaps and indexed to PubMed from 1975 until July 15, 2015.

Results: A total of 134 studies and 1445 patients were analyzed. The estimated survival rate of unconventional perfusion flaps was 89.5 percent (95 percent CI, 87.3 to 91.3 percent; p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of unconventional perfusion flaps (95 percent CI, 89.9 to 93.7 percent; p < 0.001) presented complete or nearly complete survival. Most defects mandating unconventional perfusion flap reconstruction were caused by trauma (63.6 percent), especially of the hand and fingers (75.1 percent). The main complication of all types of flaps was a variable degree of necrosis (7.5 percent of all unconventional perfusion flaps presented marginal necrosis; 9.2 percent and 5.5 percent had significant and complete necrosis, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the rate of postoperative infection and the need for a new flap (Pearson coefficient, 0.405; p = 0.001). Flaps used to reconstruct the upper limb showed better survival than those transferred to the head and neck or to the lower limb (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Unconventional perfusion flaps show high survival rates and should probably be used more liberally, particularly in the realm of upper limb reconstruction.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, V.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vaubel W. Indication and technic for arterialized grafts for the covering of large defects in the hand area (in German). Hefte Unfallheilkd. 1975;126:381384.
    1. Goldschlager R, Rozen WM, Ting JW, Leong J. The nomenclature of venous flow-through flaps: Updated classification and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2012;32:497501.
    1. Yan H, Brooks D, Ladner R, Jackson WD, Gao W, Angel MF. Arterialized venous flaps: A review of the literature. Microsurgery 2010;30:472478.
    1. Yan H, Zhang F, Akdemir O, et al. Clinical applications of venous flaps in the reconstruction of hands and fingers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:6574.
    1. Jabir S, Frew Q, El-Muttardi N, Dziewulski P. A systematic review of the applications of free tissue transfer in burns. Burns 2014;40:10591070.