"Breast in a Day": Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
- PMID: 27465178
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002333
"Breast in a Day": Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Abstract
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate, permanent implant reconstruction offers patients a prosthetic "breast in a day" compared to tissue expander techniques requiring multiple procedures.
Methods: Patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate, permanent implant reconstruction were reviewed with patient demographics and outcomes analyzed.
Results: Of 842 nipple-sparing mastectomies from 2006 to June of 2015, 160 (19.0 percent) underwent immediate, permanent implant reconstruction. The average age and body mass index were 46.5 years and 23.3 kg/m. The majority of implants were either Allergan Style 20 (48.1 percent) or Style 15 (22.5 percent). The average implant size was 376.2 ml, and 91.3 percent of reconstructions used acellular dermal matrix. The average number of reconstructive operations was 1.3. Follow-up was 21.9 months. The most common major complication was major mastectomy flap necrosis (8.1 percent). The rate of reconstructive failure was 5.6 percent and implant loss was 4.4 percent. The most common minor complication was minor mastectomy flap necrosis (14.4 percent). The rates of full-thickness and partial-thickness nipple necrosis were 4.4 and 7.5 percent, respectively. Age older than 50 years (p = 0.0276) and implant size greater than 400 ml (p = 0.0467) emerged as independent predictors of overall complications. Obesity (p = 0.4073), tobacco use (p = 0.2749), prior radiation therapy (p = 0.4613), and acellular dermal matrix (p = 0.5305) were not associated with greater complication rates.
Conclusion: Immediate, permanent implant reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy provides patients with a breast in a day in less than two procedures, with a low complication rate.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1300-1310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003340. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28538548
-
Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):1125-1133. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006781. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 32332524
-
The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12043. Epub 2012 Dec 17. Breast J. 2013. PMID: 23252505
-
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):44S-50S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003949. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 29064921 Review.
-
Is There a Preferred Incision Location for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):906e-919e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005502. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30789474
Cited by
-
Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes.Front Surg. 2022 Sep 21;9:1001019. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36277278 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Outcomes in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Mastectomy Flap Thickness Is Not One Size Fits All.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jan 11;7(1):e2103. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002103. eCollection 2019 Jan. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019. PMID: 30859052 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Length of Hospital Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation in a Case-Control Study.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Dec 28;5(12):e1588. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001588. eCollection 2017 Dec. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 29632768 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes after elevation of serratus anterior fascia flap versus serratus muscle flap in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a prospective study.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Mar 15;46:e-rbgo13. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024AO13. eCollection 2024. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38765542 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Outcomes of 1989 Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions: An Analysis of Risk Factors for Failure and Revision Surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Mar 1;155(3):469e-478e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011744. Epub 2024 Sep 24. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025. PMID: 39315798 Free PMC article.
References
-
- De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple sparing mastectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:32413249.
-
- Peled AW, Wang F, Foster RD, et al. Expanding the indications for total skin-sparing mastectomy: Is it safe for patients with locally advanced disease? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:8791.
-
- Seki T, Jinno H, Okabayashi K, et al. Comparison of oncological safety between nipple sparing mastectomy and total mastectomy using propensity score matching. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97:291297.
-
- Spear SL, Shuck J, Hannan L, Albino F, Patel KM. Evaluating long-term outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction in the irradiated breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:605e614e.
-
- Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, et al. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:32943302.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials