Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 14;4(4):457-64.
doi: 10.1002/mgg3.217. eCollection 2016 Jul.

Pitfalls in genetic testing: the story of missed SCN1A mutations

Affiliations

Pitfalls in genetic testing: the story of missed SCN1A mutations

Tania Djémié et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sanger sequencing, still the standard technique for genetic testing in most diagnostic laboratories and until recently widely used in research, is gradually being complemented by next-generation sequencing (NGS). No single mutation detection technique is however perfect in identifying all mutations. Therefore, we wondered to what extent inconsistencies between Sanger sequencing and NGS affect the molecular diagnosis of patients. Since mutations in SCN1A, the major gene implicated in epilepsy, are found in the majority of Dravet syndrome (DS) patients, we focused on missed SCN1A mutations.

Methods: We sent out a survey to 16 genetic centers performing SCN1A testing.

Results: We collected data on 28 mutations initially missed using Sanger sequencing. All patients were falsely reported as SCN1A mutation-negative, both due to technical limitations and human errors.

Conclusion: We illustrate the pitfalls of Sanger sequencing and most importantly provide evidence that SCN1A mutations are an even more frequent cause of DS than already anticipated.

Keywords: Dravet syndrome; Sanger sequencing; epilepsy; genetic screening; next‐generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Bayat, A. , Hjalgrim H., and Moller R. S.. 2015. The incidence of SCN1A‐related Dravet syndrome in Denmark is 1:22,000: a population‐based study from 2004 to 2009. Epilepsia 56:e36–e39. - PubMed
    1. Brunklaus, A. , Ellis R., Reavey E., Forbes G. H., and Zuberi S. M.. 2012. Prognostic, clinical and demographic features in SCN1A mutation‐positive Dravet syndrome. Brain 135:2329–2336. - PubMed
    1. Carvill, G. L. , Weckhuysen S., McMahon J. M., Hartmann C., Moller R. S., Hjalgrim H., et al. 2014. GABRA1 and STXBP1: novel genetic causes of Dravet syndrome. Neurology 82:1245–1253. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Claes, L. , Del‐Favero J., Ceulemans B., Lagae L., Van Broeckhoven C., andDe Jonghe P.. 2001. De novo mutations in the sodium‐channel gene SCN1A cause severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68:1327–1332. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Depienne, C. , Trouillard O., Saint‐Martin C., Gourfinkel‐An I., Bouteiller D., Carpentier W., et al. 2009a. Spectrum of SCN1A gene mutations associated with Dravet syndrome: analysis of 333 patients. J. Med. Genet. 46:183–191. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources