Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Jan;36(1):26-31.
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000970.

Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival

Affiliations
Case Reports

Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival

Medi Eslani et al. Cornea. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and management of late (>3.0 years) acute graft rejection in keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) recipients.

Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective observational case series. Six eyes of 6 patients with ocular surface transplant at a mean age of 36.2 years were seen at 3 tertiary referral centers for acute graft rejection between 2007 and 2013. Main outcome measures included strength of systemic immunosuppression (SI) at the time of rejection, time to rejection, and clinical presentation of rejection.

Results: Preoperative diagnoses included total limbal stem cell deficiency because of aniridia (n = 2) or chemical injury (n = 4). After an initially successful outcome, patients experienced late acute graft rejection at a mean time of 67.8 ± 24.1 months (range: 41-98) after KLAL while receiving suboptimal levels of SI because of medication taper (n = 5) or noncompliance (n = 1). Objective findings included an epithelial rejection line (n = 6), edema (n = 2), corneal epithelial irregularities (n = 2), and neovascularization (n = 1). Antirejection management consisted of topical corticosteroids (n = 6) and augmentation of SI therapy (n = 5).

Conclusions: These cases of late acute graft rejection in KLAL patients support the notion that allodonor cells can persist over the long run and remain at risk for immunologic rejection. It further underscores the fact that long-term success with KLAL may require extension of SI beyond the first few years, albeit at lower levels individualized to each patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Edward J. Holland is a consultant for and receives lecture fees from Allergan; consultant for and receives lecture fees from Abbott Medical Optics; consultant and receives grant support from Alcon Laboratories; consults for Senju Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; consults for TearScience; consults for TearLab. For the remaining authors none were declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical characteristics of acute rejection: A, slit-lamp photograph from a 40-year-old woman with aniridia who presented with 6 weeks of decreased vision and increased discomfort and irritation 6 years after KLAL OS while non-compliant with her systemic immunosuppression regimen. Note the epithelial rejection line (white arrow). B, superior corneal neovascularization and conjunctivalization (white arrow). C, use of fluorescein staining to highlight the epithelial rejection line.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case 6: A, preoperative slit-lamp photograph from a 37-year-old woman with aniridia demonstrating epithelial irregularity. B, a stable ocular surface at 2.5 years after keratolimbal allograft while on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. C, acute graft rejection 5.5 years after surgery evidenced by epithelial rejection line (white arrow). The patient had not received systemic immunosuppression for 2 years and had self-discontinued topical steroids one month prior to presentation. D, use of fluorescein staining to further highlight these findings.

References

    1. Davanger M, Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature. 1971;229:560–1. - PubMed
    1. Thoft RA, Friend J. The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1442–3. - PubMed
    1. Lavker RM, Tseng SC, Sun TT. Corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus: looking at some old problems from a new angle. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:433–46. - PubMed
    1. Ang AY, Chan CC, Biber JM, et al. Ocular surface stem cell transplantation rejection: incidence, characteristics, and outcomes. Cornea. 2013;32:229–36. - PubMed
    1. Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Schwartz GS. Management of aniridic keratopathy with keratolimbal allograft: a limbal stem cell transplantation technique. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:125–30. - PubMed

Substances