Race and Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients After ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarct: Results From the NCDR
- PMID: 27468142
- PMCID: PMC6490713
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.22570
Race and Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients After ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarct: Results From the NCDR
Abstract
Background: Race and sex have been shown to affect management of myocardial infarction (MI); however, it is unclear if such disparities exist in contemporary care of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Hypothesis: Disparities in care will be less prevalent in more heavily protocol-driven management of STEMI than the less algorithmic care of NSTEMI.
Methods: Data were collected from the ACTION Registry-GWTG database to assess care differences related to race and sex of patients presenting with NSTEMI or STEMI. For key treatments and outcomes, adjustments were made including patient demographics, baseline comorbidities, and markers of socioeconomic status.
Results: Key demographic variables demonstrate significant differences in baseline comorbidities; black patients had higher incidences of hypertension and diabetes, and women more frequently had diabetes. With few exceptions, rates of acute and discharge medical therapy were similar by race in any sex category in both STEMI and NSTEMI populations. Rates of catheterization were similar by race for STEMI but not for NSTEMI, where both black men and women had lower rates of invasive therapy. Rates of revascularization were significantly lower for black patients in both the STEMI and NSTEMI groups regardless of sex. Rates of adverse events differed by sex, with disparities for death and major bleeding; after adjustment, rates were similar by race within sex comparisons.
Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort, although there are differences by race in presentation and management of MI, heavily protocol-driven processes seem to show fewer racial disparities.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Disparities in Care; Gender; NSTEMI; Race; STEMI.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Sex-Based Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Complications Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The SILVER-AMI Study.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Oct;12(10):e005691. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005691. Epub 2019 Oct 14. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019. PMID: 31607145 Free PMC article.
-
Are there sex differences in the effect of type 2 diabetes in the incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction? A matched-pair analysis using hospital discharge data.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 22;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01273-y. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021. PMID: 33888124 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Differences Persist in Time to Presentation, Revascularization, and Mortality in Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e012161. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012161. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31092091 Free PMC article.
-
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Medical and Surgical Interventions.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2019 Mar;31(1):49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Dec 21. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2019. PMID: 30736935 Review.
-
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Hosp Pract (1995). 2020. PMID: 31815570 Review.
Cited by
-
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Risk Factors and Outcomes in Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Perm J. 2023 Mar 15;27(1):113-121. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.100. Epub 2022 Dec 5. Perm J. 2023. PMID: 36464782 Free PMC article.
-
Racial Disparities in Patient Characteristics and Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184240. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4240. JAMA Netw Open. 2018. PMID: 30646346 Free PMC article.
-
Racial Disparities in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management Within a Universal Healthcare Context: Insights From the AMI-OPTIMA Trial.CJC Open. 2021 Jul 24;3(12 Suppl):S28-S35. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.07.006. eCollection 2021 Dec. CJC Open. 2021. PMID: 34993431 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Use of Clinical Decision Support Tools and Implementation of Aspirin, Blood Pressure Control, Cholesterol Management, and Smoking Cessation Quality Metrics in Small Practices by Race and Sex.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326905. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26905. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37531106 Free PMC article.
-
In-hospital mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after implementation of national health insurance (NHI) in Indonesia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10637-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38443913 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [published correction appears in Circulation. 2008;117:e180]. Circulation . 2007;116:e148–e304. - PubMed
-
- Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [published corrections appear in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2464 and 2010;55:612]. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2009;54:2205–2241. - PubMed
-
- Hoekstra JW, Pollack CV, Roe MT, et al. Improving the care of patients with non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: the CRUSADE Initiative. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1146–1155. - PubMed
-
- Marciniak TA, Ellerbeck EF, Radford MJ, et al. Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA. 1998;279:1351–1357. - PubMed
-
- Spertus JA, Radford MJ, Every NR, et al. Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: summary from the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke. Circulation. 2003;107:1681–1691. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical