Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2016 Jul 11:9:187-91.
doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S107926. eCollection 2016.

Long-lasting corneal endothelial graft rejection successfully reversed after dexamethasone intravitreal implant

Affiliations
Case Reports

Long-lasting corneal endothelial graft rejection successfully reversed after dexamethasone intravitreal implant

Giuseppe Giannaccare et al. Int Med Case Rep J. .

Abstract

Graft rejection is the most significant complication corneal transplantation and the leading indication for overall corneal transplantation. Corticosteroid therapy represents the mainstay of graft rejection treatment; however, the optimal route of administration of corticosteroid remains uncertain. We report herein for the first time the multimodal imaging of a case of long-lasting corneal endothelial graft rejection successfully reversed 3 months after dexamethasone intravitreal implant. A 29-year-old Asian female presented with a long-lasting corneal endothelial graft rejection in her left phakic eye. She underwent penetrating keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus 24 months before presentation. Hourly dexamethasone eyedrops, daily intravenous methylprednisolone, and one parabulbar injection of methylprednisolone acetate were administered during the 5 days of hospitalization. However, the clinical picture remained approximately unchanged despite therapy. By mutual agreement, we opted for the off-label injection of dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant in order to provide therapeutic concentrations of steroid for a period of ~6 months. No other concomitant therapies were prescribed to the patient. Visual acuity measurement, slit lamp biomicroscopy, anterior segment photography, confocal microscopy, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, laser cell flare meter, intraocular pressure measurement, and ophthalmoscopy were performed monthly for the first postoperative 6 months. Three months after injection, both clinical and subclinical signs of rejection disappeared with a full recovery of visual acuity to 20/30 as before the episode. Currently, at the 12-month follow-up visit, the clinical picture remains stable without any sign of rejection, recurrence, or graft failure. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant seems to be a new potential effective treatment for corneal graft rejection, particularly in case of poor compliance or lack of response to conventional treatment. In addition, it could be especially useful in diabetic patients unable to receive systemic steroids.

Keywords: confocal microscopy; corneal graft rejection; dexamethasone intravitreal implant; keratoconus; keratoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical picture of corneal endothelial graft rejection at baseline. Note: Slit lamp biomicroscopy with anterior segment photography at a magnification of ×16 shows intense conjunctival hyperemia and severe corneal edema with diffuse Descemet’s folds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confocal microscopy image at baseline. Note: Confocal microscopy image shows increased number of dendritic cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clinical picture of corneal endothelial graft rejection 1 month after the injection. Note: Slit lamp biomicroscopy with anterior segment photography at a magnification of ×16 shows conjunctival hyperemia recovery and improvement in corneal transparency.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Clinical picture of corneal endothelial graft rejection 3 months after the injection. Note: Slit lamp biomicroscopy with anterior segment photography at a magnification of ×16 shows full recovery of corneal transparency with few residual Descemet’s folds not involving visual axis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Confocal microscopy image 3 months after the injection. Note: Confocal microscopy image shows dendritic cell number within the physiological range.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Williams KA, Esterman AJ, Bartlett C, Holland H, Hornsby NB, Coster DJ. How effective is penetrating corneal transplantation? Factors influencing long-term outcome in multivariate analysis. Transplantation. 2006;81(6):896–901. - PubMed
    1. Naacke HG, Borderie VM, Bourcier T, Touzeau O, Moldovan M, Laroche L. Outcome of corneal transplantation rejection. Cornea. 2001;20(4):350–353. - PubMed
    1. Costa DC, de Castro RS, Kara-Jose N. Case-control study of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide injection vs intravenous methylprednisolone pulse in the treatment of endothelial corneal allograft rejection. Eye (Lond) 2009;23(3):708–714. - PubMed
    1. Maris PJ, Jr, Correnti AJ, Donnenfeld ED. Intracameral triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for endothelial allograft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27(7):847–850. - PubMed
    1. Hudde T, Minassian DC, Larkin DF. Randomised controlled trial of corticosteroid regimens in endothelial corneal allograft rejection. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(12):1348–1352. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources