Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;37(11):1977-1982.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4897. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Comparing Preliminary and Final Neuroradiology Reports: What Factors Determine the Differences?

Affiliations

Comparing Preliminary and Final Neuroradiology Reports: What Factors Determine the Differences?

K Stankiewicz et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Trainees' interpretations of neuroradiologic studies are finalized by faculty neuroradiologists. We aimed to identify the factors that determine the degree to which the preliminary reports are modified.

Materials and methods: The character length of the preliminary and final reports and the percentage character change between the 2 reports were determined for neuroradiology reports composed during November 2012 to October 2013. Examination time, critical finding flag, missed critical finding flag, trainee level, faculty experience, imaging technique, and native-versus-non-native speaker status of the reader were collected. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between mean percentage character change and the various factors.

Results: Of 34,661 reports, 2322 (6.7%) were read by radiology residents year 1; 4429 (12.8%), by radiology residents year 2; 3663 (10.6%), by radiology residents year 3; 2249 (6.5%), by radiology residents year 4; and 21,998 (63.5%), by fellows. The overall mean percentage character change was 14.8% (range, 0%-701.8%; median, 6.6%). Mean percentage character change increased for a missed critical finding (+41.6%, P < .0001), critical finding flag (+1.8%, P < .001), MR imaging studies (+3.6%, P < .001), and non-native trainees (+4.2%, P = .018). Compared with radiology residents year 1, radiology residents year 2 (-5.4%, P = .002), radiology residents year 3 (-5.9%, P = .002), radiology residents year 4 (-8.2%, P < .001), and fellows (-8.7%; P < .001) had a decreased mean percentage character change. Senior faculty had a lower mean percentage character change (-6.88%, P < .001). Examination time and non-native faculty did not affect mean percentage character change.

Conclusions: A missed critical finding, critical finding flag, MR imaging technique, trainee level, faculty experience level, and non-native-trainee status are associated with a higher degree of modification of a preliminary report. Understanding the factors that influence the extent of report revisions could improve the quality of report generation and trainee education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Plot of model residuals by attending radiologists. For each attending radiologist, a boxplot of residuals is shown in black and the average residual value is depicted in gray.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Plot of model residuals by trainees. For each trainee, a boxplot of residuals is shown in black and the average residual value is depicted in gray.

References

    1. Babiarz LS, Yousem DM. Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:37–42 10.3174/ajnr.A2704 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viertel VG, Babiarz LS, Carone M, et al. . Quality control in neuroradiology: impact of trainees on discrepancy rates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1032–36 10.3174/ajnr.A2933 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Diagnostic Radiology. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/420_diagnos.... . Effective July 1, 2016Accessed July 14, 2016.
    1. Sharpe RE Jr, Surrey D, Gorniak RJ, et al. . Radiology report comparator: a novel method to augment resident education. J Digit Imaging 2012;25:330–36 10.1007/s10278-011-9419-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Surrey D, Sharpe RE Jr, Gorniak RJ, et al. . QRSE: a novel metric for the evaluation of trainee radiologist reporting skills. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:678–82 10.1007/s10278-013-9574-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources