Fibula osteofascial flap with proximal skin paddle for intraoral reconstruction
- PMID: 27471008
- DOI: 10.1002/micr.30084
Fibula osteofascial flap with proximal skin paddle for intraoral reconstruction
Abstract
Background: the fibula free flap has become a workhorse in intraoral reconstruction. However, its skin paddle has multiple drawbacks. The aim of this report is to establish the applicability of the fibula osteofascial flap in intraoral reconstruction.
Methods: prospectively maintained database was performed in 15 patients who underwent fibula osteofascial flap for intraoral reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction was the main location (13 patients). Ten flaps were done following tumor resection, three due to osteoradionecrosis and two following mandible fracture/bone loss. A standard fibula flap dissection performing an anterior approach was done, adding a distal fascial flap isolated on the distal perforators (for intraoral reconstruction) and a proximal skin paddle (for external soft tissue reconstruction).
Results: One flap was lost due to hypercoagulable state. Fourteen flaps survived with complete oral mucosalization, resembling physiological intraoral bone coverage by 7 weeks (range: 6-8 weeks). One patient presented with delayed donor-site wound healing. The mean follow-up was 14.4 months (range: 2-33 months). Thirteen patients (87%) were without tracheotomy at last follow-up, and 14 patients (93%) were taking at least some nutrition by mouth.
Conclusion: Fibula osteofascial flap can be safely used for intraoral reconstruction. This flap provides a stable, thin, and vascularized fascia over the fibula with minimal donor-site complications. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:276-281, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Fibula osteo-adipofascial flap for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction.Head Neck. 2012 Oct;34(10):1389-94. doi: 10.1002/hed.21947. Epub 2011 Oct 24. Head Neck. 2012. PMID: 22025346
-
Impact of venous outflow tract on survival of osteocutaneous free fibula flaps for mandibular reconstruction: A 14-year review.Head Neck. 2017 Jul;39(7):1454-1458. doi: 10.1002/hed.24796. Epub 2017 May 3. Head Neck. 2017. PMID: 28467662
-
A critical assessment of the fibula flap donor site.Head Neck. 2017 Feb;39(2):279-287. doi: 10.1002/hed.24581. Epub 2016 Sep 12. Head Neck. 2017. PMID: 27617706
-
Is distal fibular fracture an absolute contraindication to free fibular flap harvesting? A review of evidence in the literature and illustration by a successful case.Microsurgery. 2015 Jan;35(1):60-3. doi: 10.1002/micr.22252. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Microsurgery. 2015. PMID: 24677116 Review.
-
Fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction: are there old tricks for an old dog?Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2013 Feb;114(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 15. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2013. PMID: 23714213 Review.
Cited by
-
Fibular free flap with proximal perforator skin paddle due to aberrant anatomy - a case report.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 20;46(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00416-x. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 38376599 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evaluation of hyperplastic soft tissues surrounding dental implants in fibular jaws.Sci Rep. 2024 May 10;14(1):10717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60474-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38730018 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources