Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Dec;33(6):639-643.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw065. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics

Amanda F Petrik  1 , Beverly B Green  2 , William M Vollmer  3 , Thuy Le  4 , Barbara Bachman  3 , Erin Keast  3 , Jennifer Rivelli  3 , Gloria D Coronado  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics

Amanda F Petrik et al. Fam Pract. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: While electronic health records (EHRs) play a key role in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by identifying individuals who are overdue, important shortfalls remain.

Objectives: As part of the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer (STOP CRC) study, we assessed the accuracy of EHR codes in identifying patients eligible for CRC screening.

Methods: We selected a stratified random sample of 800 study participants from 26 participating clinics, in the Pacific Northwest region of the USA. We compared data obtained through codes in the EHR to conduct a manual chart audit. A trained chart abstractor completed the abstraction of eligible and ineligible patients.

Results: Of 520 individuals in need of CRC screening, identified via the EHR, 459 were confirmed through chart review (positive predictive value = 88%). Of 280 individuals flagged as up-to-date in their screening per EHR data, 269 were confirmed through chart review (negative predictive value = 96%). Among the 61 patients incorrectly classified as eligible, 83.6% of disagreements were due to evidence of a prior colonoscopy or referral that was not captured in recognizable fields in the EHR.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight importance of better capture of past screening events in the EHR. While the need for better population-based data is not unique to CRC screening, it provides an important example of the use of population-based data not only for tracking care, but also for delivering interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01742065.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; community medicine; electronic health record; gastroenterology; screening..

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration. Colorectal Cancer Screening [online]. http://www.hrsa.gov/quality/toolbox/measures/colorectalcancer/index.html (accessed on 6 September 2016).
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013; 62: 881–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. In: Cancer Screening—United States, 2010. Atlanta, GA, 2012, pp. 41–56. - PubMed
    1. Garborg K, Holme O, Loberg M, Kalager M, Adami HO, Bretthauer M. Current status of screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 1963–72. - PubMed
    1. Sarfaty M, Doroshenk M, Hotz J, et al. Strategies for expanding colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 221–31. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data