Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;30(9):1215-20.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.163. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

Paediatric intraocular lens implants: accuracy of lens power calculations

Affiliations

Paediatric intraocular lens implants: accuracy of lens power calculations

M K O'Gallagher et al. Eye (Lond). 2016 Sep.

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the accuracy of lens prediction formulae on a paediatric population.MethodsA retrospective case-note review was undertaken of patients under 8 years old who underwent cataract surgery with primary lens implantation in a regional referral centre for paediatric ophthalmology, excluding those whose procedure was secondary to trauma. Biometric and refractive data were analysed for 43 eyes, including prediction errors (PE). Statistical measures used included mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), Student's t-test and Lin's correlation coefficient.ResultsThe mean PE using the SRK-II formula was +0.96 D (range -2.47D to +2.41 D, SD 1.33 D, MAE 1.38 D, MedAE 1.55, n=15). The mean PE was smaller using SRK/T (-0.18 D, range -3.25 D to +3.95 D, SD 1.70 D, MAE 1.30 D, MedAE 1.24, n=27). We performed an analysis of the biometry data using four different formula (Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK-II and SRK/T). Hoffer Q showed a smaller MedAE than other formulae but also a myopic bias.ConclusionOur clinical data suggest SRK/T was more accurate in predicting post-operative refraction in this cohort of paediatric patients undergoing cataract surgery. Hoffer Q may have improved accuracy further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot showing the spread of observed prediction errors for SRK-II and SRK/T.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Strip chart showing prediction discrepancies for all formulae.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Archer SM, Del Monte MA. Intraocular lens power calculations in children. Surv Ophthalmol 2007; 52: 474–482. - PubMed
    1. Solebo AL, Russell-Eggitt I, Nischal KK, Moore AT, Cumberland P, Rahi JS et al. on behalf of the British Isles Congenital Cataract Interest Group. Cataract surgery and primary intraocular lens implantation in children ≤2 years old in the UK and Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1495–1498. - PubMed
    1. Andreo LK, Wilson ME, Saunders RA. Predictive value of regression and theoretical IOL formulas in pediatric intraocular lens implantation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997; 34: 240–243. - PubMed
    1. The Royal College of OphthalmologistsCataract Surgery Guidelines, 2nd ed. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists: London, UK, 2010.
    1. R Development Core Team, RA Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2011.