Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;9(4):567-71.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw054. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

Provider acceptance of an automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury

Janice Oh  1 , Joshua R Bia  2 , Muhamad Ubaid-Ullah  3 , Jeffrey M Testani  3 , Francis Perry Wilson  4
Affiliations

Provider acceptance of an automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury

Janice Oh et al. Clin Kidney J. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support systems, including electronic alerts, ideally provide immediate and relevant patient-specific information to improve clinical decision-making. Despite the growing capabilities of such alerts in conjunction with an expanding electronic medical record, there is a paucity of information regarding their perceived usefulness. We surveyed healthcare providers' opinions concerning the practicality and efficacy of a specific text-based automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury (AKI) in a single hospital during a randomized trial of AKI alerts.

Methods: Providers who had received at least one electronic AKI alert in the previous 6 months, as part of a separate randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov #01862419), were asked to complete a survey concerning their opinions about this specific AKI alert system. Individual approval of the alert system was defined by a provider's desire to continue receiving the alert after termination of the trial.

Results: A total of 98 individuals completed the survey, including 62 physicians, 27 pharmacists and 7 non-physician providers. Sixty-nine percent of responders approved the alert, with no significant difference among the various professions (P = 0.28). Alert approval was strongly correlated with the belief that the alerts improved patient care (P < 0.0001), and negatively correlated with the belief that alerts did not provide novel information (P = 0.0001). With each additional 30 days of trial duration, odds of approval decreased by 20% (3-35%) (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: The alert system was generally well received, although approval waned with time. Approval was correlated with the belief that this type of alert improved patient care. These findings suggest that perceived efficacy is critical to the success of future alert trials.

Keywords: acute kidney injury; alert; alert fatigue; approval; clinical decision support.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Campbell EM et al. . Some unintended consequences of clinical decision support systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007: 26–30 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Publication No. 09-0069-EF. Rockville, MD: AHRQ, 2009
    1. Strom BL, Schinnar R, Aberra F et al. . Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1578–1583 - PubMed
    1. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM et al. . A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 965–970 - PubMed
    1. Trowbridge R, Weingarten S. Clinical decision support systems. In: Shojania K, Duncan B, McDonald K et al. (eds). Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 43 AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058. Rockville, MD: AHRQ, 2001

LinkOut - more resources