Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
- PMID: 27478810
- PMCID: PMC4961887
- DOI: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
Abstract
Purpose: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device.
Methods: Patients undergoing TLA were matched with patients undergoing CLA between February 2015 and November 2015 at the same institution. Thirty-two patients underwent TLA with a needle grasper. The appendix was secured by a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper), then removed through a puncture at McBurney's point. Another 38 patients underwent CLA. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated.
Results: One patient in the TLA group developed a wound infection and 1 patient in the CLA group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and 3 wound infections. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the length of hospital stay, time until oral intake, and other complications. The pain score in the first 12 hours after surgery was significanly higher in CLA group than the TLA group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter in the CLA group compared to the TLA group (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: TLA using a needle grasper was associated with a significantly lower pain score 12 hours after surgery, better cosmetic results, and lower cost, than the CLA 3-port procedure because of the fewer number of ports.
Keywords: Appendectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Minimal invasive surgical procedures.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Front Surg. 2022 Jun 8;9:919744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.919744. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35756463 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy with the help of a needle grasper: better cosmetic results and fewer trocars than conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11(2):105-10. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.60504. Epub 2016 Jun 13. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016. PMID: 27458491 Free PMC article.
-
Modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):102607. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025. PMID: 40291869 Free PMC article.
-
Suprapubic single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.J Surg Res. 2016 Jan;200(1):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.032. Epub 2015 Jul 27. J Surg Res. 2016. PMID: 26279236
-
Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review.Surg Open Sci. 2021 Aug 26;6:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2021.08.001. eCollection 2021 Oct. Surg Open Sci. 2021. PMID: 34604728 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of postoperative pain after needle grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial (PANASILA trial).Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Dec;101(6):350-359. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.6.350. Epub 2021 Dec 1. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021. PMID: 34934762 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Two Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Technique at a Rural Hospital.Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 May 19;2019:9761968. doi: 10.1155/2019/9761968. eCollection 2019. Minim Invasive Surg. 2019. PMID: 31236293 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Front Surg. 2022 Jun 8;9:919744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.919744. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35756463 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy.J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Mar;22(1):11-17. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11. Epub 2019 Mar 15. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019. PMID: 35601706 Free PMC article.
-
Using the endoscopic snare to facilitate two-port laparoscopic appendectomy.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3814-3820. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11743-z. Epub 2025 May 6. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40328978 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2011;254:927–932. - PubMed
-
- Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:266–269. - PubMed
-
- Lee J, Baek J, Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:100–103. - PubMed
-
- Lee YS, Kim JH, Moon EJ, Kim JJ, Lee KH, Oh SJ, et al. Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:493–496. - PubMed
-
- St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, Sharp SW, Garey CL, Laituri CA, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254:586–590. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources