Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation
- PMID: 27482015
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37240
Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation
Abstract
Aims: We conducted a randomised controlled trial to assess the accuracy of positioning and alignment of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), comparing those undertaken using standard intramedullary cutting jigs and those with patient-specific instruments (PSI).
Patients and methods: There were 64 TKAs in the standard group and 69 in the PSI group. The post-operative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and positioning was investigated using CT scans. Deviation of > 3° from the planned position was regarded as an outlier. The operating time, Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores were recorded.
Results: There were 14 HKA-angle outliers (22%) in the standard group and nine (13%) in the PSI group (p = 0.251). The mean HKA-angle was 0.5° varus in the standard group and 0.2° varus in the PSI group (p = 0.492). The accuracy of alignment in the coronal and axial planes and the proportion of outliers was not different in the two groups. The femoral component was more flexed (p = 0.035) and there were significantly more tibial slope outliers (29% versus 13%) in the PSI group (p = 0.032). Operating time and the median three-month OKS were similar (p = 0.218 and p = 0.472, respectively). Physical and mental SF-12 scores were not significantly different at three months (p = 0.418 and p = 0.267, respectively) or at one year post-operatively (p = 0.114 and p = 0.569). The median one-year Oxford knee score was two points higher in the PSI group (p = 0.049).
Conclusion: Compared with standard intramedullary jigs, the use of PSI did not significantly reduce the number of outliers or the mean operating time, nor did it clinically improve the accuracy of alignment or the median Oxford Knee Scores. Our data do not support the routine use of PSI when undertaking TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1043-9.
Keywords: Operation time; Oxford Knee Score; Patient-matched instrumentation; Patient-specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty.
©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
Similar articles
-
Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan;24(1):102-11. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3345-2. Epub 2014 Oct 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 25326759
-
Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty achieves better postoperative alignment compared to conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in a low-volume setting.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Nov;104(7):971-975. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29704634
-
Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1792-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4792-3. Epub 2017 Nov 28. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 29181560 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):386-94. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1193799. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27249110 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-specific instrumentation improved axial alignment of the femoral component, operative time and perioperative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1083-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5256-0. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 30377714 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 23;20(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2940-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 31759392 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of component alignment in total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional guides: a retrospective study.SICOT J. 2025;11:44. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2025044. Epub 2025 Aug 4. SICOT J. 2025. PMID: 40758900 Free PMC article.
-
Spacer Block Technique Was Superior to Intramedullary Guide Technique in Coronal Alignment of Femoral Component after Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Case-Control Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 31;59(1):89. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010089. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36676713 Free PMC article.
-
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block instrumentation versus standard instrumentation.Can J Surg. 2019 Dec 1;62(6):460-467. doi: 10.1503/cjs.018318. Can J Surg. 2019. PMID: 31782643 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and directions for future research.Bone Joint Res. 2019 Nov 2;8(10):438-442. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0175. eCollection 2019 Oct. Bone Joint Res. 2019. PMID: 31728181 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical