Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 2:16:684.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3382-5.

What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?

Affiliations

What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?

Siriporn Pooripussarakul et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: There is a need to identify rational criteria and set priorities for vaccines. In Thailand, many licensed vaccines are being considering for introduction into the Expanded Program on Immunization; thus, the government has to make decisions about which vaccines should be adopted. This study aimed to set priorities for new vaccines and to facilitate decision analysis.

Methods: We used a best-worst scaling study for rank-ordering of vaccines. The candidate vaccines were determined by a set of criteria, including burden of disease, target age group, budget impact, side effect, effectiveness, severity of disease, and cost of vaccine. The criteria were identified from a literature review and by in-depth, open-ended interviews with experts. The priority-setting model was conducted among three groups of stakeholders, including policy makers, healthcare professionals and healthcare administrators. The vaccine data were mapped and then calculated for the probability of selection.

Results: From the candidate vaccines, the probability of hepatitis B vaccine being selected by all respondents (96.67 %) was ranked first. This was followed, respectively, by pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 (95.09 %) and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (90.87 %). The three groups of stakeholders (policy makers, healthcare professionals and healthcare administrators) showed the same ranking trends. Most severe disease, high fever rate and high disease burden showed the highest coefficients for criterion levels being selected by all respondents. This result can be implied that a vaccine which can prevent most severe disease with high disease burden and has low safety has a greater chance of being selected by respondents in this study.

Conclusions: The priority setting of vaccines through a multiple-criteria approach could contribute to transparency and accountability in the decision-making process. This is a step forward in the development of an evidence-based approach that meets the need of developing country. The methodology is generalizable but its application to another country would require the criteria as relevant to that country.

Keywords: Decision-making; Priority-setting; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chen RT, Orenstein WA. Epidemiologic methods in immunization programs. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:99–117. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burchett HE, Mounier-Jack S, Griffiths UK, Mills AJ. National decision-making on adopting new vaccines: a systematic review. Health Policy Plann. 2012;27(Suppl 2):ii62–76. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for routine immunization – summary tables. http://who.int/immunization/policy/immunization_tables/en/. Accessed on 23 aJun 2013.
    1. Bärnighausen T, Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, O’Brien JC. Economic evaluation of vaccination: capturing the full benefits, with an application to human papillomavirus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(Suppl 5):70–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03977.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uddin J, Sarma H, Bari TI, Koehlmoos TP. Introduction of new vaccines: decision-making process in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(2):1–7. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v31i2.16385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms