Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;7(5):755-62.
doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0511-8. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

Characteristics and trends in publication of scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology: a comparison between 2000 and 2010

Affiliations

Characteristics and trends in publication of scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology: a comparison between 2000 and 2010

Will Loughborough et al. Insights Imaging. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To determine journal publication rates of scientific papers presented orally at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2010, with comparison of country data to ECR 2000.

Methods: All oral presentations from ECR 2010 were evaluated for publication between 2010 and 2014 using the MEDLINE database. Countries, collaborations, subspecialties, modalities and study design were ranked by publication percentage. Chi-square tests were used to compare publication percentages for each category of variables. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for each country relative to the host nation, Austria. ECR 2010 country statistics were compared with analogous data from ECR 2000.

Results: In total, 360/840 abstracts were subsequently published (43 %). The author's country of origin (p = 0.02), subspecialty (p = 0.02) and study design (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with subsequent publication. Switzerland, the Netherlands, France and Germany were among the top six countries by publication percentage in 2000 and 2010. In 2010, Switzerland had the highest publication rate (62 %) and HR in comparison to Austria (HR 2.62 [1.31-5.25], p = 0.01). Three Asian nations increased relative publication rates over the 10-year period.

Conclusion: Several European nations consistently convert relatively high percentages of oral abstracts at ECR into publications, and the influence of Asian countries is increasing.

Main messages: • Certain European nations consistently publish high percentages of orally presented abstracts at ECR. • The influence of several Asian countries on ECR is increasing. • Country, subspecialty and study design are significantly associated with journal publication. • Authors collaborating internationally have the highest publication rates and mean impact factors. • Among all modalities, PET-CT, MRI and CT have the highest publication percentages.

Keywords: Abstracts; Authorship; Journal impact factor; Publications; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Scally G, Donaldson LJ. Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ. 1998;317:61–65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.61. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miguel-Dasit A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Aleixandre R, Sanfeliu P, Bautista D. Publication of material presented at radiologic meetings: authors’ country and international collaboration. Radiology. 2006;239(2):521–528. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miguel-Dasit A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Sanfeliu P, Aleixandre R (2006) Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology 2000: Publication rates and characteristics during the period 2000–2004. Eur Radiol 16(2):445–450 - PubMed
    1. Yoon PD, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles. BJU Int. 2012;110(4):485–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10879.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R. Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):833–840. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.024. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources