Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 19:4:75.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00075. eCollection 2016.

Achiasmy: Male Fruit Flies Are Not Ready to Mix

Affiliations

Achiasmy: Male Fruit Flies Are Not Ready to Mix

Alphy John et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. .

Abstract

Maintenance of the chromosomal copy number over generations and recombination between homologous chromosomes are hallmarks of meiotic cell division. This genetic exchange that take place during gamete formation leads to genetic diversity, the main driving force behind natural selection. Formation of chiasmata, the physical link between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, is a requisite for recombination. In addition, chiasmata also aid in proper segregation of homologous chromosomes and has a major impact on reproductive fitness. Given these facts it is intriguing that many insect species have forgone the need for genetic exchange between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Geneticists for several decades knew that meiotic crossover and recombination is absent in Drosophila males and some female lepidopterans, a condition termed achiasmy. However, a good understanding of the mechanisms that cause achiasmy and the evolutionary benefits of achiasmy is currently lacking. In this article we will discuss possible genetic and molecular basis of achiasmy in male Drosophila.

Keywords: Drosophila meiotic recombination; achiasmy; crossover; homologous recombination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The “standard meiotic script”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen S. L., Sekelsky J. (2010). Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes. Bioessays 32, 1058–1066. 10.1002/bies.201000087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson L. K., Royer S. M., Page S. L., Mckim K. S., Lai A., Lilly M. A., et al. . (2005). Juxtaposition of C(2)M and the transverse filament protein C(3)G within the central region of Drosophila synaptonemal complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 4482–4487. 10.1073/pnas.0500172102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ault J. G., Lin H. P., Church K. (1982). Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent. Chromosoma 86, 309–317. 10.1007/BF00292259 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ault J. G., Rieder C. L. (1994). Meiosis in Drosophila males. I. The question of separate conjunctive mechanisms for the XY and autosomal bivalents. Chromosoma 103, 352–356. 10.1007/BF00417883 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachtrog D. (2005). Sex chromosome evolution: molecular aspects of Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila. Genome Res. 15, 1393–1401. 10.1101/gr.3543605 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources