Achiasmy: Male Fruit Flies Are Not Ready to Mix
- PMID: 27486580
- PMCID: PMC4949207
- DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00075
Achiasmy: Male Fruit Flies Are Not Ready to Mix
Abstract
Maintenance of the chromosomal copy number over generations and recombination between homologous chromosomes are hallmarks of meiotic cell division. This genetic exchange that take place during gamete formation leads to genetic diversity, the main driving force behind natural selection. Formation of chiasmata, the physical link between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, is a requisite for recombination. In addition, chiasmata also aid in proper segregation of homologous chromosomes and has a major impact on reproductive fitness. Given these facts it is intriguing that many insect species have forgone the need for genetic exchange between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Geneticists for several decades knew that meiotic crossover and recombination is absent in Drosophila males and some female lepidopterans, a condition termed achiasmy. However, a good understanding of the mechanisms that cause achiasmy and the evolutionary benefits of achiasmy is currently lacking. In this article we will discuss possible genetic and molecular basis of achiasmy in male Drosophila.
Keywords: Drosophila meiotic recombination; achiasmy; crossover; homologous recombination.
Similar articles
-
Ancient Male Recombination Shaped Genetic Diversity of Neo-Y Chromosome in Drosophila albomicans.Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Feb;33(2):367-74. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv221. Epub 2015 Oct 22. Mol Biol Evol. 2016. PMID: 26494844
-
Connecting by breaking and repairing: mechanisms of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination.FEBS J. 2015 Jul;282(13):2444-57. doi: 10.1111/febs.13317. Epub 2015 May 20. FEBS J. 2015. PMID: 25953379 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Meiotic Chromosome Stability and Suppression of Crossover Between Non-homologous Chromosomes in xBrassicoraphanus, an Intergeneric Allotetraploid Derived From a Cross Between Brassica rapa and Raphanus sativus.Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jun 16;11:851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00851. eCollection 2020. Front Plant Sci. 2020. PMID: 32612629 Free PMC article.
-
Meiotic recombination mechanisms.C R Biol. 2016 Jul-Aug;339(7-8):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 11. C R Biol. 2016. PMID: 27180110 Review.
-
Positive Selection and Functional Divergence at Meiosis Genes That Mediate Crossing Over Across the Drosophila Phylogeny.G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Oct 7;9(10):3201-3211. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400280. G3 (Bethesda). 2019. PMID: 31362974 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The potential of inversions to accumulate balanced sexual antagonism is supported by simulations and Drosophila experiments.Elife. 2025 Apr 16;12:RP93338. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93338. Elife. 2025. PMID: 40237307 Free PMC article.
-
Paternal gender specificity and mild phenotypes in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A patients with de novo 17p12 rearrangements.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1380. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1380. Epub 2020 Jul 9. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020. PMID: 32648354 Free PMC article.
-
Extensive Genetic Differentiation between Homomorphic Sex Chromosomes in the Mosquito Vector, Aedes aegypti.Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):2322-2335. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx171. Genome Biol Evol. 2017. PMID: 28945882 Free PMC article.
-
Shared evolutionary trajectories of three independent neo-sex chromosomes in Drosophila.Genome Res. 2021 Nov;31(11):2069-2079. doi: 10.1101/gr.275503.121. Epub 2021 Oct 21. Genome Res. 2021. PMID: 34675069 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of an Irradiation-Induced Recombination Suppressing Inversion on the Genetic Stability and Biological Quality of a White Eye-Based Aedes aegypti Genetic Sexing Strain.Insects. 2022 Oct 18;13(10):946. doi: 10.3390/insects13100946. Insects. 2022. PMID: 36292893 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andersen S. L., Sekelsky J. (2010). Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes. Bioessays 32, 1058–1066. 10.1002/bies.201000087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Anderson L. K., Royer S. M., Page S. L., Mckim K. S., Lai A., Lilly M. A., et al. . (2005). Juxtaposition of C(2)M and the transverse filament protein C(3)G within the central region of Drosophila synaptonemal complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 4482–4487. 10.1073/pnas.0500172102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases