Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 5;4(4):e51-e511.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00048.

Challenging the Conventional Standard for Thoracic Spine Range of Motion: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Challenging the Conventional Standard for Thoracic Spine Range of Motion: A Systematic Review

Sean L Borkowski et al. JBJS Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Segmental motion is a fundamental characteristic of the thoracic spine; however, studies of segmental ranges of motion have not been summarized or analyzed. The purpose of the present study was to present a summary of the literature on intact cadaveric thoracic spine segmental range of motion in each anatomical plane.

Methods: A systematic MEDLINE search was performed with use of the terms "thoracic spine," "motion," and "cadaver." Reports that included data on the range of motion of intact thoracic human cadaveric spines were included. Independent variables included experimental details (e.g., specimen age), type of loading (e.g., pure moments), and applied moment. Dependent variables included the ranges of motion in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

Results: Thirty-three unique articles were identified and included. Twenty-three applied pure moments to thoracic spine specimens, with applied moments ranging from 1.5 to 8 Nm. Estimated segmental range of motion pooled means ranged from 1.9° to 3.8° in flexion-extension, from 2.1° to 4.4° in lateral bending, and from 2.4° to 5.2° in axial rotation. The sums of the range of motion pooled means (T1 to T12) were 28° in flexion-extension, 36° in lateral bending, and 45° in axial rotation.

Conclusions: The pooled ranges of motion were similar to reported in vivo motions but were considerably smaller in magnitude than the frequently referenced values reported prior to the widespread use of biomechanical testing standards. Improved reporting of biomechanical testing methods, as well as specimen health, may be beneficial for improving on these estimations of segmental cadaveric thoracic spine range of motion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Ishii T, Kashii M, Murase T, Sugiura T, Matsuo Y, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H. Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk rotation: in vivo 3-dimensional analysis. Spine. 2012 Oct 1;37(21):E1318-28.
    1. Heneghan NR, Hall A, Hollands M, Balanos GM. Stability and intra-tester reliability of an in vivo measurement of thoracic axial rotation using an innovative methodology. Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):452-5. Epub 2008 Nov 30.
    1. Willems JM, Jull GA, J KF. An in vivo study of the primary and coupled rotations of the thoracic spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996 Sep;11(6):311-6.
    1. Troke M, Moore AP, Cheek E. Reliability of the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer with a new skin fixation system when used on the thoracic spine. Man Ther. 1998 Feb;3(1):27-33.
    1. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Matsuo Y, Ishii T, Sugiura T, Kashii M, Murase T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H. Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk lateral bending: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1991-9. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources