Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct;23(10):825-832.
doi: 10.1111/iju.13170. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

Skeletal complications in cancer patients with bone metastases

Affiliations
Review

Skeletal complications in cancer patients with bone metastases

Shunsuke Tsuzuki et al. Int J Urol. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

As a result of significant improvements in current therapies, the life expectancy of cancer patients with bone metastases has dramatically improved. Unfortunately, these patients often experience skeletal complications that significantly impair their quality of life. The major skeletal complications associated with bone metastases include: cancer-induced bone pain, hypercalcemia, pathological bone fractures, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression and cancer cachexia. Once cancer cells invade the bone, they perturb the normal physiology of the marrow microenvironment, resulting in bone destruction, which is believed to be a direct cause of skeletal complications. However, full understanding of the mechanisms responsible for these complications remains unknown. In the present review, we discuss the complications associated with bone metastases along with matched conventional therapeutic strategies. A better understanding of this topic is crucial, as targeting skeletal complications can improve both the morbidity and mortality of patients suffering from bone metastases.

Keywords: bone metastasis; cancer-induced bone pain; hypercalcemia; metastatic epidural spinal cord compression; pathological bone fractures; skeletal complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The mechanisms whereby disseminated tumor cells are directly involved in the development of skeletal complications associated with bone metastasis
Growing evidence suggests that once in the marrow, DTCs create a favorable microenvironment for their own metastatic progression by interfering with the normal functions of bone marrow. Indeed, DTCs disturb bone remodeling by altering the balance between osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis. Osteolytic tumor cells stimulate osteoclastic activities by expressing PTHrP or IL-6, and/or by inducing RANKL secretion by osteoblasts. Osteoclastogenesis mediated by DTCs plays a crucial role in the development of serious complications involved with bone metastasis, including bone pain, hypercalcemia, and malignant fracture. In addition, ET-1 expressed by DTCs develops osteoblastic metastatic lesions in the bone and is related to cancer-induced bone pain. At the same time, DTCs engage with sensory neurons in the marrow directly through NGF, COX-2, and Ang II signaling pathways, resulting in cancer-induced bone pain. These pain transmitters may also affect metastatic growth. Therefore, targeting bone remodeling and blocking the cancer/nerve interactions may be a successful therapeutic strategy for eradicating bone metastatic disease and improving patient quality of life. DTC: disseminated tumor cell; OB: osteoblast; OC: osteoclast; PTHrP: parathyroid hormone-related protein; IL-6: interleukin-6; RANK: receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand; RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand; ET-1: endothelin-1; NGF: nerve growth factor; COX-2: cycloxygenase-2; Ang II: angiotensin II.

References

    1. Pond GR, Sonpavde G, de Wit R, Eisenberger MA, Tannock IF, Armstrong AJ. The prognostic importance of metastatic site in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65:3–6. - PubMed
    1. Christofori G. New signals from the invasive front. Nature. 2006;441:444–50. - PubMed
    1. Sleeman JP. The metastatic niche and stromal progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31:429–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murgai M, Giles A, Kaplan R. Physiological, Tumor, and Metastatic Niches: Opportunities and Challenges for Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment. Crit Rev Oncog. 2015;20:301–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olechnowicz SW, Edwards CM. Contributions of the host microenvironment to cancer-induced bone disease. Cancer Res. 2014;74:1625–31. - PMC - PubMed