Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 15:41 Suppl 20:S205-S211.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001835.

A Systematic Review With Consensus Expert Opinion of Best Reconstructive Techniques After Osseous En Bloc Spinal Column Tumor Resection

R Andrew Glennie  1 , Y Raja Rampersaud  2 , Stefano Boriani  3 , Jeremy J Reynolds  4 , Richard Williams  5 , Ziya L Gokaslan  6 , Meic H Schmidt  7 , Peter P Varga  8 , Charles G Fisher  9
Affiliations

A Systematic Review With Consensus Expert Opinion of Best Reconstructive Techniques After Osseous En Bloc Spinal Column Tumor Resection

R Andrew Glennie et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Systematic literature review and consensus expert opinion.

Objective: To provide recommendations on reconstructive constructs for large tumor resections of the spinal column. Four questions were studied: (1) What are the best reconstructive options for single versus multilevel resections? (2) Should short segment fixation be considered in primary tumor reconstruction? (3) How should reconstructive techniques differ at various regions of the spine? (4) Does planned postoperative radiation change the fusion strategy?

Summary of background data: Primary spinal tumors requiring en bloc resection are rare. Most studies focus on disease-free survival and local recurrence rates. Few studies focus on reconstructive options and outcomes with respect to fusion rates and need for revision.

Methods: A literature search was performed from January 1990 to December 2013. Data were combined and construct survivorship summarized. A survey was administered to international spine tumor surgeons, evaluating reconstructive preferences.

Results: The search yielded 381 articles, 12 included in the final analysis. Revision rates for anterior reconstruction were similar for autogenous strut grafts (10%), cages (7.7%), and allograft strut grafts (8.3%). There were two reports of revision from short to long segment constructs and three reports of broken pedicle screws, one requiring revision. Expert survey results revealed that most surgeons preferred cages packed with morcelized allograft and autograft (75%) for anterior reconstruction of single-level vertebrectomies, and strut bone grafting at the cervicothoracic junction (65%) and when more than one vertebrae was resected in the mid-thoracic spine (75%). Surgeons may alter their fusion technique if postoperative radiation is planned.

Conclusion: Posterior reconstruction with at least two vertebral levels above and below is recommended. Cages should be used for single-level defects and structural bone graft alone, or in combination with a cage, should be used when spanning a defect greater than two vertebral bodies. Planned postoperative radiation may affect fusion strategy.

Level of evidence: N/A.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fisher CG, Keynan O, Boyd MC, Dvorak MF. The surgical management of primary tumors of the spine: initial results of an ongoing prospective cohort study. Spine 2005; 30:1899–1908.
    1. Dekeuwer P, Odent T, Cadilhac C, et al. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine in children: a 9-year follow-up of 7 cases and review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003; 89:97–106.
    1. Demura S, Kawahara N, Murakami H, et al. Giant cell tumor expanded into the thoracic cavity with spinal involvement. Orthopedics 2012; 35:e453–e456.
    1. Fidler MW. Radical resection of vertebral body tumours. A surgical technique used in ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76:765–772.
    1. Gupta A, Nath R, Mishra M. Giant cell tumor of bone: multimodal approach. Indian J Orthop 2007; 41:115–120.

Publication types