Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 2;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S103-16.
doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s034.

Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision

B Middleton et al. Yearb Med Inform. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize the state of the art of clinical decision support (CDS) circa 1990, review progress in the 25 year interval from that time, and provide a vision of what CDS might look like 25 years hence, or circa 2040.

Method: Informal review of the medical literature with iterative review and discussion among the authors to arrive at six axes (data, knowledge, inference, architecture and technology, implementation and integration, and users) to frame the review and discussion of selected barriers and facilitators to the effective use of CDS.

Result: In each of the six axes, significant progress has been made. Key advances in structuring and encoding standardized data with an increased availability of data, development of knowledge bases for CDS, and improvement of capabilities to share knowledge artifacts, explosion of methods analyzing and inferring from clinical data, evolution of information technologies and architectures to facilitate the broad application of CDS, improvement of methods to implement CDS and integrate CDS into the clinical workflow, and increasing sophistication of the end-user, all have played a role in improving the effective use of CDS in healthcare delivery.

Conclusion: CDS has evolved dramatically over the past 25 years and will likely evolve just as dramatically or more so over the next 25 years. Increasingly, the clinical encounter between a clinician and a patient will be supported by a wide variety of cognitive aides to support diagnosis, treatment, care-coordination, surveillance and prevention, and health maintenance or wellness.

Keywords: Clinical decision support; artificial intelligence; electronic health record; expert systems; health information technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Osheroff JA, Levick DL, Saldana L, Velasco FT, Sittig DF, Rogers KM, et al. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer’s Guide, 2nd ed., Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Chicago, IL; 2012.
    1. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:141–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henry SB, Lenert L, Middleton B, Partridge R. Linking process and outcome with an integrated clinical information management system. Proc HIMSS 1993;7:81-93.
    1. Friedman CP, Wong AK, Blumenthal D. Achieving a nationwide learning health system, Sci Transl Med 2010;2:1-3. - PubMed
    1. Etheredge LM. A rapid-learning health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w107-18. - PubMed

MeSH terms