Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision
- PMID: 27488402
- PMCID: PMC5171504
- DOI: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s034
Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize the state of the art of clinical decision support (CDS) circa 1990, review progress in the 25 year interval from that time, and provide a vision of what CDS might look like 25 years hence, or circa 2040.
Method: Informal review of the medical literature with iterative review and discussion among the authors to arrive at six axes (data, knowledge, inference, architecture and technology, implementation and integration, and users) to frame the review and discussion of selected barriers and facilitators to the effective use of CDS.
Result: In each of the six axes, significant progress has been made. Key advances in structuring and encoding standardized data with an increased availability of data, development of knowledge bases for CDS, and improvement of capabilities to share knowledge artifacts, explosion of methods analyzing and inferring from clinical data, evolution of information technologies and architectures to facilitate the broad application of CDS, improvement of methods to implement CDS and integrate CDS into the clinical workflow, and increasing sophistication of the end-user, all have played a role in improving the effective use of CDS in healthcare delivery.
Conclusion: CDS has evolved dramatically over the past 25 years and will likely evolve just as dramatically or more so over the next 25 years. Increasingly, the clinical encounter between a clinician and a patient will be supported by a wide variety of cognitive aides to support diagnosis, treatment, care-coordination, surveillance and prevention, and health maintenance or wellness.
Keywords: Clinical decision support; artificial intelligence; electronic health record; expert systems; health information technology.
Similar articles
-
Decision support in dermatology and medicine: history and recent developments.Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012 Sep;31(3):153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2012.06.005. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012. PMID: 22929351 Review.
-
Design and implementation of a standards-based interoperable clinical decision support architecture in the context of the Korean EHR.Int J Med Inform. 2010 Sep;79(9):611-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.002. Int J Med Inform. 2010. PMID: 20620098
-
Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27. Int J Med Inform. 2012. PMID: 22456088
-
Integrating pharmacogenomics into electronic health records with clinical decision support.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Dec 1;73(23):1967-1976. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160030. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016. PMID: 27864204 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The clinical decision support consortium.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:26-30. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009. PMID: 19745260
Cited by
-
The Potential of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Monitoring of Allergic Diseases.Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 10;11:2116. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02116. eCollection 2020. Front Immunol. 2020. PMID: 33013892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
21st century (clinical) decision support in nursing and allied healthcare. Developing a learning health system: a reasoned design of a theoretical framework.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02372-4. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023. PMID: 38053104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: a Focused Literature Survey.Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug;28(1):120-127. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677911. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Yearb Med Inform. 2019. PMID: 31419824 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inclusion of Clinicians in the Development and Evaluation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Literature Review.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:830345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830345. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35465567 Free PMC article.
-
The number needed to benefit: estimating the value of predictive analytics in healthcare.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1655-1659. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz088. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31192367 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Osheroff JA, Levick DL, Saldana L, Velasco FT, Sittig DF, Rogers KM, et al. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer’s Guide, 2nd ed., Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Chicago, IL; 2012.
-
- Henry SB, Lenert L, Middleton B, Partridge R. Linking process and outcome with an integrated clinical information management system. Proc HIMSS 1993;7:81-93.
-
- Friedman CP, Wong AK, Blumenthal D. Achieving a nationwide learning health system, Sci Transl Med 2010;2:1-3. - PubMed
-
- Etheredge LM. A rapid-learning health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w107-18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous