Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:9:771-784.
doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9339-x. Epub 2015 Oct 18.

Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: a Latent Variable Approach

Affiliations

Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: a Latent Variable Approach

Torbjørn Torsheim et al. Child Indic Res. 2016.

Abstract

The aim was to develop and test a brief revised version of the family affluence scale. A total of 7120 students from Denmark, Greenland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Scotland and Slovakia reported on a list of 16 potential indicators of affluence. Responses were subject to item screening and test of dimensionality. Bifactor analysis revealed a strong general factor of affluence in all countries, but with additional specific factors in all countries. The specific factors mainly reflected overlapping item content. Item screening was conducted to eliminate items with low discrimination and local dependence, reducing the number of items from sixteen to six: Number of computers, number of cars, own bedroom, holidays abroad, dishwasher, and bathroom. The six-item version was estimated with Samejima's graded response model, and tested for differential item functioning by country. Three of the six items were invariant across countries, thus anchoring the scale to a common metric across countries. The six-item scale correlated with parental reported income groups in six out of eight countries. Findings support a revision to six items in the family affluence scale.

Keywords: Adolescence; FASIII; HBSC; Measurement; SES.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Item characteristic curves for FAS III
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Test information curve for FAS II and FAS III

References

    1. Batista-Foguet JM, Fortiana J, Currie C, Villalbí JR. Socio-economic indexes in surveys for comparisons between countries. Social Indicators Research. 2004;67(3):315–332. doi: 10.1023/B:SOCI.0000032341.14612.b8. - DOI
    1. Bollen KA, Bauldry S. Three Cs in measurement models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods. 2011;16(3):265–284. doi: 10.1037/a0024448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J. The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review. 2003;110(2):203–219. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boudreau B, Poulin C. An examination of the validity of the family affluence scale II (FAS II) in a general adolescent population of Canada. Social Indicators Research. 2009;94(1):29–42. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9334-4. - DOI
    1. Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK. Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;39(8):1–30. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i08. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources