Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;32(1):172-180.
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2935. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

Amalgamated Reference Data for Size-Adjusted Bone Densitometry Measurements in 3598 Children and Young Adults-the ALPHABET Study

Affiliations

Amalgamated Reference Data for Size-Adjusted Bone Densitometry Measurements in 3598 Children and Young Adults-the ALPHABET Study

Nicola J Crabtree et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

The increasing use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in children has led to the need for robust reference data for interpretation of scans in daily clinical practice. Such data need to be representative of the population being studied and be "future-proofed" to software and hardware upgrades. The aim was to combine all available pediatric DXA reference data from seven UK centers to create reference curves adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and body size to enable clinical application, using in vivo cross-calibration and making data back and forward compatible. Seven UK sites collected data on GE Lunar or Hologic Scanners between 1996 and 2012. Males and females aged 4 to 20 years were recruited (n = 3598). The split by ethnic group was white 2887; South Asian 385; black Afro-Caribbean 286; and mixed heritage 40. Scans of the total body and lumbar spine (L1 to L4 ) were obtained. The European Spine Phantom was used to cross-calibrate the 7 centers and 11 scanners. Reference curves were produced for L1 to L4 bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) and total body less head (TBLH) and L1 to L4 areal bone mineral density (aBMD) for GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA (sex- and ethnic-specific) and for Hologic (sex-specific). Regression equations for TBLH BMC were produced using stepwise linear regression. Scans of 100 children were randomly selected to test backward and forward compatibility of software versions, up to version 15.0 for GE Lunar and Apex 4.1 for Hologic. For the first time, sex- and ethnic-specific reference curves for lumbar spine BMAD, aBMD, and TBLH aBMD are provided for both GE Lunar and Hologic scanners. These curves will facilitate interpretation of DXA data in children using methods recommended in ISCD guidelines. The databases have been created to allow future updates and analysis when more definitive evidence for the best method of fracture prediction in children is agreed. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Keywords: BMC; BMD; DXA; LEAN MASS; PEDIATRIC; REFERENCE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of GE Lunar iDXA™ lumbar spine BMAD LMS reference curves between the three different ethnic groups. (A) BMAD (g/cm3) for girls; (B) BMAD (g/cm3) for boys. Solid black line represents the mean for White Caucasian Children (± 95% Confidence interval -dotted black line). Dark grey dashed line represents the mean for Black Afro-Caribbean Children; Dashed light grey line represents the mean for South Asian Children.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of lumbar spine BMAD LMS reference curves between males and females (A) GE Lunar iDXA; (B) Hologic Discovery. Solid black line represents males (mean ± 95% Confidence interval). Dashed line represents females (mean ± 95% Confidence interval).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of lumbar spine BMAD LMS reference curves between manufacturers, GE Lunar iDXA™ compared to Transformed Hologic Discovery (Hologic data transformed using cross calibration equations generated from the European Spine Phantom). (A) Females; (B) Males. Solid black line represents GE Lunar iDXA™ (mean ± 95% Confidence interval). Dashed line represents Hologic Discovery (mean ± 95% Confidence interval).

References

    1. Crabtree NJ, Arabi A, Bachrach LK, Fewtrell M, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Kecskemethy HH, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17(2):225–42. - PubMed
    1. Gordon CM, Leonard MB, Zemel BS, International Society for Clinical D 2013 Pediatric Position Development Conference: executive summary and reflections. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17(2):219–24. - PubMed
    1. Bishop N, Arundel P, Clark E, Dimitri P, Farr J, Jones G, et al. Fracture prediction and the definition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents: the ISCD 2013 Pediatric Official Positions. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2014;17(2):275–80. - PubMed
    1. Carter D, Bouxsein M, Marcus R. New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:137–45. - PubMed
    1. Kroger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J, Kotaniemi A. Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology. Bone. 1995;17(2 SU -):157–9. - PubMed

Publication types