Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Aug 9;68(6):626-635.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.049.

Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Robert L McNamara et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 6;71(9):1060-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.004. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29495994 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: As a foundation for quality improvement, assessing clinical outcomes across hospitals requires appropriate risk adjustment to account for differences in patient case mix, including presentation after cardiac arrest.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a parsimonious patient-level clinical risk model of in-hospital mortality for contemporary patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: Patient characteristics at the time of presentation in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry-GWTG (Get With the Guidelines) database from January 2012 through December 2013 were used to develop a multivariate hierarchical logistic regression model predicting in-hospital mortality. The population (243,440 patients from 655 hospitals) was divided into a 60% sample for model derivation, with the remaining 40% used for model validation. A simplified risk score was created to enable prospective risk stratification in clinical care.

Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6%. Age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, presentation after cardiac arrest, presentation in cardiogenic shock, presentation in heart failure, presentation with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, creatinine clearance, and troponin ratio were all independently associated with in-hospital mortality. The C statistic was 0.88, with good calibration. The model performed well in subgroups based on age; sex; race; transfer status; and the presence of diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Observed mortality rates varied substantially across risk groups, ranging from 0.4% in the lowest risk group (score <30) to 49.5% in the highest risk group (score >59).

Conclusions: This parsimonious risk model for in-hospital mortality is a valid instrument for risk adjustment and risk stratification in contemporary patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: cardiac arrest; cardiogenic shock; creatinine clearance; model; risk prediction; systolic blood pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types