Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;147(11):882-890.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Michael S McCracken et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this study were to quantify practitioner variation in likelihood to recommend a crown and test whether certain dentist, practice, and clinical factors are associated significantly with this likelihood.

Methods: Dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network completed a questionnaire about indications for single-unit crowns. In 4 clinical scenarios, practitioners ranked their likelihood of recommending a single-unit crown. The authors used these responses to calculate a dentist-specific crown factor (range, 0-12). A higher score implied a higher likelihood of recommending a crown. The authors tested certain characteristics for statistically significant associations with the crown factor.

Results: A total of 1,777 of 2,132 eligible dentists (83%) responded. Practitioners were most likely to recommend crowns for teeth that were fractured, cracked, or endodontically treated or had a broken restoration. Practitioners overwhelmingly recommended crowns for posterior teeth treated endodontically (94%). Practice owners, practitioners in the Southwest, and practitioners with a balanced workload were more likely to recommend crowns, as were practitioners who used optical scanners for digital impressions.

Conclusions: There is substantial variation in the likelihood of recommending a crown. Although consensus exists in some areas (posterior endodontic treatment), variation dominates in others (size of an existing restoration). Recommendations varied according to type of practice, network region, practice busyness, patient insurance status, and use of optical scanners.

Practical implications: Recommendations for crowns may be influenced by factors unrelated to tooth and patient variables. A concern for tooth fracture-whether from endodontic treatment, fractured teeth, or large restorations-prompted many clinicians to recommend crowns.

Keywords: Dentistry; crowns; prosthodontics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA. Summary review of the survival of single crowns. Gen Dent. 2009;57(1):74–81. - PubMed
    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Roberson TM. Using crowns to prevent tooth fracture. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996;24(1):47–51. - PubMed
    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Martin JA. Risk indicators for posterior tooth fracture. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(7):883–92. - PubMed
    1. Fernandez E, Martin J, Vildosola P, et al. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43(2):279–86. - PubMed
    1. Gordan VV, Riley J, 3rd, Geraldeli S, et al. The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN. J Dent. 2014;42(12):1528–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources