Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1129-32.
doi: 10.1126/science.aah6157. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys

Affiliations

Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys

Peter Abbink et al. Science. .

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is responsible for a major ongoing epidemic in the Americas and has been causally associated with fetal microcephaly. The development of a safe and effective ZIKV vaccine is therefore an urgent global health priority. Here we demonstrate that three different vaccine platforms protect against ZIKV challenge in rhesus monkeys. A purified inactivated virus vaccine induced ZIKV-specific neutralizing antibodies and completely protected monkeys against ZIKV strains from both Brazil and Puerto Rico. Purified immunoglobulin from vaccinated monkeys also conferred passive protection in adoptive transfer studies. A plasmid DNA vaccine and a single-shot recombinant rhesus adenovirus serotype 52 vector vaccine, both expressing ZIKV premembrane and envelope, also elicited neutralizing antibodies and completely protected monkeys against ZIKV challenge. These data support the rapid clinical development of ZIKV vaccines for humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Immunogenicity of the ZIKV PIV vaccine
(A) Env-specific ELISA titers and (B) ZIKV-specific microneutralization (MN50) titers following immunization of rhesus monkeys by the s.c route with 5 μg ZIKV PIV vaccine at weeks 0 and 4 (red arrows). The maximum measurable log MN50 titer in this assay was 3.86. Cellular immune responses by IFN-γ ELISPOT assays to prM, Env, Cap, and NS1 at (C) week 2 and (D) week 6. Red bars reflect medians.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Protective efficacy of the ZIKV PIV vaccine
PIV vaccinated and sham control rhesus monkeys (N=8/group) were challenged by the s.c route with 106 VP (103 PFU) ZIKV-BR or ZIKV-PR. Each group contained 6 female and 2 male animals. Viral loads are shown in (A) plasma, (B) urine, (C) CSF, (D) colorectal secretions, and (E) cervicovaginal secretions. Viral loads were determined on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 for the plasma samples (A) and on days 0, 3, 7 for the other samples (B–E). Data is shown for all 8 animals in each panel, except for the 6 females for cervicovaginal secretions in (E). P-value reflects Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Adoptive transfer studies in mice
(A) Env-specific serum ELISA titers and (B) ZIKV-specific microneutralization (MN50) titers in serum from recipient Balb/c mice (N=5/group) 1 hour following adoptive transfer of 5-fold serial dilutions (Groups I, II, III, IV) of IgG purified from PIV vaccinated rhesus monkeys or sham controls. (C) Plasma viral loads in mice following challenge with 105 VP (102 PFU) ZIKV-BR. (D, E) Immune correlates of protection. Red bars reflect medians. P-values reflect t-tests.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Adoptive transfer studies in rhesus monkeys
(A) ZIKV-specific microneutralization (MN50) titers in serum from recipient rhesus monkeys (N=2/group) 1 hour following adoptive transfer of 5-fold dilutions (Groups I, II) of IgG purified from PIV vaccinated rhesus monkeys or sham controls. (B) Plasma viral loads in rhesus monkeys following challenge with 106 VP (103 PFU) ZIKV-BR. Red bars reflect medians.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Immunogenicity of the ZIKV DNA-prM-Env and RhAd52-prM-Env vaccines
(A) ZIKV-specific microneutralization (MN50) titers following immunization of rhesus monkeys by the i.m. route with 5 mg DNA-prM-Env vaccine at weeks 0 and 4 (red arrows) or a single immunization with 1011 vp RhAd52-prM-Env at week 0. (B) Cellular immune responses by IFN-γ ELISPOT assays to prM, Env, Cap, and NS1 at week 6 for the DNA vaccine or at week 4 for the RhAd52 vaccine. Red bars reflect medians.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Protective efficacy of the ZIKV DNA-prM-Env and RhAd52-prM-Env vaccines
DNA vaccinated, RhAd52 vaccinated, and sham control rhesus monkeys (N=4/group) were challenged by the s.c route with 106 VP (103 PFU) ZIKV-BR or ZIKV-PR. Plasma viral loads are shown.

Comment in

  • Zika vaccine trials.
    Lipsitch M, Cowling BJ. Lipsitch M, et al. Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1094-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8126. Science. 2016. PMID: 27609872 No abstract available.

References

    1. Fauci AS, Morens DM. Zika Virus in the Americas--Yet Another Arbovirus Threat. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374:601. - PubMed
    1. Petersen LR, Jamieson DJ, Powers AM, Honein MA. Zika Virus. N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374:1552. - PubMed
    1. Mlakar J, et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 10;374:951. - PubMed
    1. Brasil P, et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 4; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374:1981. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms