Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 12:4:2050312116659089.
doi: 10.1177/2050312116659089. eCollection 2016.

Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program

Affiliations

Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program

Akhilesh S Pathipati et al. SAGE Open Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Teledermatology has proven to be an effective means of providing dermatologic care. The existing research has primarily evaluated its usefulness in a consultative model. Few academic centers have evaluated a patient-initiated model, and direct-to-consumer services remain the subject of controversy. Stanford Health Care recently launched a direct-care, patient-initiated teledermatology pilot program. This article evaluates the viability and patient satisfaction with this service.

Materials and methods: During the pilot period, patients were able to seek remote dermatologic care using an eVisit tool in their MyHealth account. Patients initiated the consultation, answered questions regarding their complaint, and uploaded a picture if relevant. A Stanford dermatologist reviewed each eVisit and responded with an assessment and plan. The dermatologist noted whether they were able to make a diagnosis and their level of confidence in it. After the study, 10 patients participated in a focus group to provide feedback on the service.

Results: In all, 38 patients sought care during the pilot period. A dermatologist was able to make a diagnosis in 36 of 38 (95%) cases, with an average confidence level of 7.9 of 10. The average time to consultation was 0.8 days. Patients indicated high levels of satisfaction with the service although they had suggestions for improvement.

Discussion: Patients provided clinically useful images and information in a direct-care teledermatology model. Such services allow dermatology providers to increase access while maintaining high-quality care in an academic medical center. Further research is needed on standalone services that cannot integrate encounters with the patient's existing medical record.

Keywords: Dermatology; direct-to-consumer telehealth; teledermatology; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Craig J, Patterson V. Introduction to the practice of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 3–9. - PubMed
    1. Whited JD. Teledermatology research review. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45: 220–229. - PubMed
    1. McGoey ST, Oakley A, Rademaker M. Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand. J Telemed Telecare 2015; 21: 414–419. - PubMed
    1. Landow SM, Oh DH, Weinstock MA. Teledermatology within the Veterans Health Administration, 2002–2014. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 769–773. - PubMed
    1. Johnson MN, Armstrong AW. Technologies in dermatology: teledermatology review. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2011; 146: 143–153. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources