Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):14-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

Mild, moderate, and severe intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale

Affiliations
Observational Study

Mild, moderate, and severe intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale

Margaret L Campbell et al. Heart Lung. 2017 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: The Respiratory Distress Observation Scale© (RDOS) is a means for assessing respiratory distress when a patient is unable to give a dyspnea self-report. Cut-point determination was needed to guide clinical application.

Method: A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted in a prospective, observation study with inpatients ranked by nurse practitioners (NP) into levels of respiratory distress. A research assistant simultaneously measured RDOS blinded to NP ranking.

Results: Participants were 84 adults: mean age of 72.6 (SD = 15.2) years, 53.6% male, 77.4% African-American. NP ranking was distributed: none (30%), mild (26%), moderate (31%), and severe (13%) distress. RDOS scores ranged 0-13 (M = 4.8, SD = 3). NP ranking was significantly correlated with RDOS (rho = .91, p < .01). ROC curve analyses yielded cut-points: none = 0-2, any = 3, mild-moderate = 4-6, and severe ≥7 (p < .01).

Conclusions: Intensity cut-point enhances the clinical utility of the RDOS.

Keywords: Assessment; Cut-points; Dyspnea; ROC curve analyses; Respiratory distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types