Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222.
doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

Affiliations

The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

Joanna Brooks et al. Qual Res Psychol. .

Abstract

Thematic analysis is widely used in qualitative psychology research, and in this article, we present a particular style of thematic analysis known as Template Analysis. We outline the technique and consider its epistemological position, then describe three case studies of research projects which employed Template Analysis to illustrate the diverse ways it can be used. Our first case study illustrates how the technique was employed in data analysis undertaken by a team of researchers in a large-scale qualitative research project. Our second example demonstrates how a qualitative study that set out to build on mainstream theory made use of the a priori themes (themes determined in advance of coding) permitted in Template Analysis. Our final case study shows how Template Analysis can be used from an interpretative phenomenological stance. We highlight the distinctive features of this style of thematic analysis, discuss the kind of research where it may be particularly appropriate, and consider possible limitations of the technique. We conclude that Template Analysis is a flexible form of thematic analysis with real utility in qualitative psychology research.

Keywords: Pictor technique; Template Analysis; a priori themes; applied research; group data analysis; qualitative research; thematic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of a ‘Pictor’ chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Case study 1 - initial template.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Case study 1 - version 8 template (top theme 1 only shown).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Case study 2 - final version template.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Case study 3 - initial template.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Case study 3 – final template.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.

References

    1. Boothby JL, Thorn BE, Overduin LY. Ward LC. Catastrophizing and perceived partner responses to pain. Pain. 2004;109:500–6. ‘. ’. - PubMed
    1. Braun V. Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:77–101. ‘. ’.
    1. Brooks J. Young people with diabetes and their peers - an exploratory study of peer attitudes, beliefs, responses and influences. Project report to Diabetes UK, University of Huddersfield; 2014.
    1. Brooks J, McCluskey S, King N. Burton K. Illness perceptions in the context of differing work participation outcomes: exploring the influence of significant others in persistent back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013;14:48. ‘. ’. p. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks J, King N. Wearden A. ‘Couples’ experiences of interacting with outside others in chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative study’. Chronic Illness. 2014;10:5–17. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources