Barriers and facilitators to preventive cancer screening in Limited English Proficient (LEP) patients: Physicians' perspectives
- PMID: 27499725
- PMCID: PMC4971758
- DOI: 10.1558/cam.v11i3.24051
Barriers and facilitators to preventive cancer screening in Limited English Proficient (LEP) patients: Physicians' perspectives
Abstract
Background: Limited English proficient (LEP) patients receive fewer recommended preventive screenings than English-speaking patients. Studies have explored patients' perceptions of the factors that contribute to this disparity, but little research has focused on physicians' perceptions.
Objective: To describe physicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to preventive cancer screening in LEP patients.
Design: Qualitative interview study using a semi-structured interview guide.
Participants: Eight primary care physicians from Wisconsin.
Approach: Each interview was systematically coded to illuminate important themes.
Key results: A variety of barriers specifically hinder LEP patients' receipt of cancer screening, including poor language proficiency, lack of transportation, unfamiliarity with the concept of prevention, complex scheduling systems, poor interpretation, and limited physician time to discuss preventive care. While physicians identified many factors that facilitate preventive screening in general, they mentioned few that are perceived as specific to LEP patients.
Conclusion: We found that primary care physicians attribute the low rates of preventive cancer screening among LEP populations to a variety of patient, provider, interpreter, and system factors, most of which go beyond simple language barriers. Interventions designed to reduce these barriers and enhance the impact of identified facilitators should be multifactorial and designed to engage primary care physicians.
Keywords: Limited English proficiency; cancer screening; disparities; qualitative research.
Figures
References
-
- Akers AY, Newmann SJ, et al. Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States. Curr Probl Cancer. 2007;31(3):157–81. - PubMed
-
- Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Citizenship. Australia’s Migration Trends 2011–12 at a glance.
-
- Beach ML, Flood AB, Robinson CM, Cassells AN, Tobin JN, Greene MA, et al. Can language-concordant prevention care managers improve cancer screening rates? Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2007;16(10):2058–2064. - PubMed
-
- Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research. 2008;8(1):137–152.
-
- Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J. “Clear as mud”: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2008;2(2):1–13.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous