Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;8(7):1747-52.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.14.

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer

Affiliations

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer

Mong-Wei Lin et al. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The Da Vinci robotic system has been used to enhance the surgeon's visualization and agility in lung cancer surgery, and thus facilitate refined dissection, knot tying and suturing. However, only a few case reports exist on performing a sleeve lobectomy with a robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) technique. Here we describe our early experience performing RATS sleeve lobectomies. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a series of RATS sleeve lobectomies.

Methods: The six consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent a RATS sleeve lobectomy between November 2013 and July 2015 at the National Taiwan University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The lobectomies were all performed by the same surgeon using a three-arm robotic system with an additional utility incision made for assistance and specimen retrieval.

Results: Five patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, while the sixth was diagnosed with a carcinoid tumor. The mean operation time was 436.7 [255-745] minutes. The mean postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay were 3.7 [1-11] and 11.3 [3-26] days, respectively. Two (33.3%; 2/6) morbidities were noted, including one pneumonia and one anastomosis stricture. There were no cases of mortality or of conversion to thoracotomy.

Conclusions: Our experience performing a RATS sleeve lobectomy in the six patients demonstrated the feasibility of RATS in complex lung cancer surgeries. The three-dimensional vision and articulated joint instruments made robotic-assisted bronchial anastomosis easier under the endoscopic setting. Our experience suggests that RATS offers specific advantages with regard to accuracy and safety when performing sleeve lobectomies.

Keywords: Robotic sugery; lung cancer surgery; sleeve lobectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bronchial anastomosis during RATS sleeve lobectomy. (A) After left upper lobe sleeve lobectomy, a needle driver was introduced to replace the electrocautery instrument; (B) left lower lobe bronchus and left main bronchus anastomosis was performed with a continuous running suture with 4-0 absorbable monofilament stitches (case 3). RATS, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pre- and postoperative images of RATS sleeve lobectomy. (A) Preoperative computed tomography imaging illustrating the tumor in the hilum; (B) computed tomography imaging; and (C) bronchoscopy illustrating patent bronchial anastomosis 3 months after surgery (case 3). RATS, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

References

    1. Whitson BA, Andrade RS, Boettcher A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1965-70. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.049 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:366-78. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul S, Sedrakyan A, Chiu YL, et al. Outcomes after lobectomy using thoracoscopy vs thoracotomy: a comparative effectiveness analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:813-7. 10.1093/ejcts/ezs428 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, et al. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:864-8. 10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00102-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louie BE, Farivar AS, Aye RW, et al. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1598-604; discussion 1604-5. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.067 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources