Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;6(4):322-39.
doi: 10.21037/cdt.2015.12.08.

Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes by imaging coronary atherosclerosis

Affiliations
Review

Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes by imaging coronary atherosclerosis

Faraz Pathan et al. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Over the last two decades, several invasive and non-invasive coronary atherosclerosis imaging modalities have emerged as predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in at-risk population. These modalities have demonstrated independent or incremental prognostic information over existing/standard risk stratification schemes, such as the Framingham risk score (FRS), by identifying characteristics of coronary artery diseases (CADs). In this review, we begin with discussing the importance of pre-test probability and quality of outcome measure, followed by specific findings of each modality in relation to prognosis. We focused on both short and long term prognostic aspects of coronary computed tomography (CT) (including coronary calcium score and coronary angiography) and magnetic resonance imaging as non-invasive tools, as well as invasive modalities including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), near infrared spectroscopy and Angioscopy.

Keywords: Coronary atherosclerosis; cardiovascular outcomes; coronary imaging; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adverse prognostic sings on CTCA. (A) Napkin ring sign with positive remodeling; (B) curve-linear LAD view; (C) spotty calcification with positive remodeling. CTCA, computed tomographic coronary angiography; LAD, left anterior descending artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Characteristics of high risk plaque. (A) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of high-signal intensity of the right coronary artery with a plaque to myocardium signal intensity ratio of 3.09 (yellow arrow indicates lesion); (B) a coronary angiogram showing severe stenosis in the proximal portion of the right coronary artery; (C) gray-scale intravascular ultrasound image showing ultrasound attenuation; (D) integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound showing lipid-rich plaque (blue area). Reprint from Hoshi et al. (52). Reproduced with permission of the publisher. Copyright © 2015, Oxford University Press.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IVUS positive remodeling. Courtesy of Dr Hiroko Tsuchiya. IVUS, intravascular ultrasound.
Figure 4
Figure 4
OCT TCFA. Courtesy of Dr Hiroko Tsuchiya. OCT, optical coherence tomography; TCFA, thin-cap fibroatheroma.

References

    1. Shishikura D. Noninvasive imaging modalities to visualize atherosclerotic plaques. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016;6:340-53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Honda S, Kataoka Y, Kanaya T, et al. Characterization of coronary atherosclerosis by intravascular imaging modalities. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016;6:368-81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hachamovitch R, Di Carli MF. Methods and limitations of assessing new noninvasive tests: Part II: Outcomes-based validation and reliability assessment of noninvasive testing. Circulation 2008;117:2793-801. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.714006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hlatky MA, Greenland P, Arnett DK, et al. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009;119:2408-16. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, et al. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004;291:210-5. 10.1001/jama.291.2.210 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources