Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;12(4):740-56.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.12352. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

How multiple episodes of exclusive breastfeeding impact estimates of exclusive breastfeeding duration: report from the eight-site MAL-ED birth cohort study

Affiliations

How multiple episodes of exclusive breastfeeding impact estimates of exclusive breastfeeding duration: report from the eight-site MAL-ED birth cohort study

Ramya Ambikapathi et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

The duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is often defined as the time from birth to the first non-breast milk food/liquid fed (EBFLONG), or it is estimated by calculating the proportion of women at a given infant age who EBF in the previous 24 h (EBFDHS). Others have measured the total days or personal prevalence of EBF (EBFPREV), recognizing that although non-EBF days may occur, EBF can be re-initiated for extended periods. We compared breastfeeding metrics in the MAL-ED study; infants' breastfeeding trajectories were characterized from enrollment (median 7 days, IQR: 4, 12) to 180 days at eight sites. During twice-weekly surveillance, caretakers were queried about infant feeding the prior day. Overall, 101 833 visits and 356 764 child days of data were collected from 1957 infants. Median duration of EBFLONG was 33 days (95% CI: 32-36), compared to 49 days based on the EBFDHS. Median EBFPREV was 66 days (95% CI: 62-70). Differences were because of the return to EBF after a non-EBF period. The median number of returns to EBF was 2 (IQR: 1, 3). When mothers re-initiated EBF (second episode), infants gained an additional 18.8 days (SD: 25.1) of EBF, and gained 13.7 days (SD: 18.1) (third episode). In settings where women report short gaps in EBF, programmes should work with women to return to EBF. Interventions could positively influence the duration of these additional periods of EBF and their quantification should be considered in impact evaluation studies. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: Bangladesh; Brazil; DHS; India; MAL-ED; Nepal; Pakistan; Peru; South Africa; Tanzania; duration; exclusive breastfeeding; metrics; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Breastfeeding trajectory plot of 50 children from Loreto, PEL. Each number/row on the y‐axis indicates the pattern of feeding for a child with age in days on x axis. Blue represents exclusive breastfeeding (EBF); orange represents predominant feeding (Predominant BF); yellow represents partial breastfeeding with liquids only (Part BF:liq); brown represents partial breastfeeding with solids (Part BF: sol) and red represents no breastfeeding (No BF). ‘|’ in the sequence indicates when the visit was made. The preceding visit feeding is assumed in the days in between for illustrative purposes. For example, child 25 starts out with exclusive bf, shifts to predominant bf ~day 40, shifts back to exclusive at day 60, which stops at ~day 90. The total gain of EBF days in the first episode of EBF is 40 days and in the second episode, gain is 30 days.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three metrics for EBF median duration are arranged by median re‐initiation of EBF, from low (PKN) to high (PEL): EBFLONG is the longitudinal method (from birth to first reported non‐breastmilk substance), EBFDHS is calculated using the DHS interpolation method, and EBFPREV is the personal prevalence. MAL‐ED study sites are referred to by abbreviations for their location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (BGD); Fortaleza, Brazil (BRF); Vellore, India (INV); Bhaktapur, Nepal (NEB); Naushahro Feroze, Pakistan (PKN); Loreto, Peru (PEL); Venda, South Africa (SAV); Haydom, Tanzania (TZH).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence of EBF in the previous day by MAL‐ED sites. Each site has 180 markers representing the prevalence of EBF for the previous day (from day 1 to 180 of child's life).

References

    1. Aarts C., Kylberg E., Hornell A., Hofvander Y., Gebre‐Medhin M. & Greiner T. (2000) How exclusive is exclusive breastfeeding? A comparison of data since birth with current status data. International Journal of Epidemiology Oxford University Press 29 (6), 1041–1046. DOI: 10.1093/ije/29.6.1041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agampodi S.B. & Agampodi T. (2009) Use of exclusive breast feeding definitions; a call for action!. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health 38 (2), 77–78. DOI: 10.4038/sljch.v38i2.688. - DOI
    1. Agampodi S.B., Agampodi T.C. & de Silva A. (2009) Exclusive breastfeeding in Sri Lanka: problems of interpretation of reported rates. International Breastfeeding Journal BioMed Central Ltd 4 (1), 14 DOI: 10.1186/1746-4358-4-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agampodi S.B., Fernando S., Dharmaratne S.D. & Agampodi T.C. (2011) Duration of exclusive breastfeeding; validity of retrospective assessment at nine months of age. BMC Pediatrics BioMed Central Ltd 11 (1), 80 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-80. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed, T. , Mahfuz, M. , Islam, M. M. , Mondal, D. , Hossain, M. I. , Ahmed, A. S. , Tofail, F. , Gaffar, S. A. , Haque, R. , Guerrant, R. L. and Petri, W. A. (2014) The MAL‐ED Cohort Study in Mirpur, Bangladesh, Clinical Infectious Diseases. Oxford University Press, 59 Suppl 4(suppl 4), pp. S280–6. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu458. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types