Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;12(4):940-8.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.12334. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of intervention programs to address micronutrient malnutrition: symposium report

Maaike J Bruins  1 , Roland Kupka  2 , Michael B Zimmermann  3 , Georg Lietz  4 , Reina Engle-Stone  5 , Klaus Kraemer  6   7
Affiliations

Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of intervention programs to address micronutrient malnutrition: symposium report

Maaike J Bruins et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Interventions to address micronutrient deficiencies have large potential to reduce the related disease and economic burden. However, the potential risks of excessive micronutrient intakes are often not well determined. During the Global Summit on Food Fortification, 9-11 September 2015, in Arusha, a symposium was organized on micronutrient risk-benefit assessments. Using case studies on folic acid, iodine and vitamin A, the presenters discussed how to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of intervention programs to address micronutrient malnutrition. Pre-implementation assessment of dietary intake, and/or biomarkers of micronutrient exposure, status and morbidity/mortality is critical in identifying the population segments at risk of inadequate and excessive intake. Dietary intake models allow to predict the effect of micronutrient interventions and their combinations, e.g. fortified food and supplements, on the proportion of the population with intakes below adequate and above safe thresholds. Continuous monitoring of micronutrient intake and biomarkers is critical to identify whether the target population is actually reached, whether subgroups receive excessive amounts, and inform program adjustments. However, the relation between regular high intake and adverse health consequences is neither well understood for many micronutrients, nor do biomarkers exist that can detect them. More accurate and reliable biomarkers predictive of micronutrient exposure, status and function are needed to ensure effective and safe intake ranges for vulnerable population groups such as young children and pregnant women. Modelling tools that integrate information on program coverage, dietary intake distribution and biomarkers will further enable program makers to design effective, efficient and safe programs.

Keywords: food fortification; micronutrient malnutrition; nutritional interventions; nutritional supplements; public health; risk-benefit assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Maaike Bruins is employed at DSM, a manufacturer of vitamin and mineral premixes. Klaus Kraemer is the director of Sight and Life foundation, a nutrition think tank primarily funded by DSM.

References

    1. von Grebmer K., Saltzman A., Birol E., Wiesmann D., Prasai N., Yin S. et al (2014) 2014 Global Hunger Index: The Challenge of Hidden Hunger. Welthungerhilfe, International Food Policy Research Institute, and Concern Worldwide: Bonn, Washington, D.C., and Dublin.
    1. Muthayya S., Rah J.H., Sugimoto J.D., Roos F.F., Kraemer K. & Black R.E. (2013) The global hidden hunger indices and maps: an advocacy tool for action. PLoS One 8 (6), e67860. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katona P. & Katona‐Apte J. (2008) The interaction between nutrition and infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46 (10), 1582–8. - PubMed
    1. Black R.E., Victora C.G., Walker S.P., Bhutta Z.A., Christian P., de Onis M. et al. (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low‐income and middle‐income countries. Lancet 382 (9890), 427–51. - PubMed
    1. Copenhagen Consensus Panel . Copenhagen consensus statement 2012; Available from: http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/copenhagen-consensus-iii/outcome (Accessed 29 April 2016).