Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Aug 9:6:31228.
doi: 10.1038/srep31228.

Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Da Li et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that assisted hatching (AH) techniques may improve clinical pregnancy rates, particularly in poor prognosis patients; however, there still remains considerable uncertainty. We conducted a meta-analysis to verify the effect of AH on pregnancy outcomes. We searched for related studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from start dates to October 10, 2015. Totally, 36 randomized controlled trials with 6459 participants were included. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for whether by AH or not were estimated. We found a significant increase in clinical pregnancy (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.00-1.36, I(2) = 48.3%) and multiple pregnancy rates (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.11-2.01, I(2) = 44.0%) with AH when compared to the control. Numerous subgroup analyses stratified by hatching method, conception mode, extent of AH, embryos transfer status, and previous failure history were also carried out. Interestingly, significant results of clinical pregnancy as well as multiple pregnancy rates were observed among women who received intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and who received AH which the zona were completely removed. In summary, this meta-analysis supports that AH was associated with an increased chance of achieving clinical pregnancy and multiple pregnancy. Whether AH significantly changes live birth and miscarriage rates needs further investigations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow-chart of study selection.

References

    1. Kissin D. M. et al. Assisted hatching: trends and pregnancy outcomes, United States, 2000–2010. Fertil Steril 102, 795–801 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfeifer S. et al. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril 102, 348–351 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Carney S. K. et al. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12, D1894 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martins W. P., Rocha I. A., Ferriani R. A. & Nastri C. O. Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update 17, 438–453 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Hagemann A. R. et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of assisted hatching in women younger than 38 years undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 93, 586–591 (2010). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources