Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:7416728.
doi: 10.1155/2016/7416728. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

Using Multidisciplinary Focus Groups to Inform the Development of mI SMART: A Nurse-Led Technology Intervention for Multiple Chronic Conditions

Jennifer A Mallow  1 , Laurie A Theeke  1 , Elliott Theeke  1 , Brian K Mallow  2
Affiliations

Using Multidisciplinary Focus Groups to Inform the Development of mI SMART: A Nurse-Led Technology Intervention for Multiple Chronic Conditions

Jennifer A Mallow et al. Nurs Res Pract. 2016.

Abstract

Used as integrated tools, technology may improve the ability of healthcare providers to improve access and outcomes of care. Little is known about healthcare teams' preferences in using such technology. This paper reports the findings from focus groups aimed at evaluating a newly developed primary care technology platform. Focus groups were completed in academic, outpatient, and community settings. Focus groups were attended by 37 individuals. The participants included professionals from multiple disciplines. Both prescribing (N = 8) and nonprescribing healthcare team members (n = 21) completed the focus groups and survey. The majority were practicing for more than 20 years (44.8%) in an outpatient clinic (62%) for 20-40 hours per week (37.9%). Providers identified perceived obstacles of patient use as ability, willingness, and time. System obstacles were identified as lack of integration, lack of reimbursement, and cost. The positive attributes of the developed system were capability for virtual visits, readability, connectivity, user-friendliness, ability to capture biophysical measures, enhanced patient access, and incorporation of multiple technologies. Providers suggested increasing capability for biophysical and symptom monitoring for more common chronic conditions. Technology interventions have the potential to improve access and outcomes but will not be successful without the input of users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Past use of technology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Future use of mI SMART and other technologies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Workflow.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mallow J. A., Theeke L. A., Barnes E. R., Whetsel T., Mallow B. K. Using mHealth tools to improve rural diabetes care guided by the chronic care model. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care. 2014;14(1):43–65. doi: 10.14574/ojrnhc.v14i1.276. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer A. M., Thielke S. M., Katon W., Unützer J., Areán P. Aligning health information technologies with effective service delivery models to improve chronic disease care. Preventive Medicine. 2014;66:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoyt R. E., Yoshihashi A. K. Health Informatics: Practical Guide for Healthcare and Information Technology Professionals. Lulu.com; 2014.
    1. Mallow J. A., Theeke L. A., Long D. M., Whetsel T., Theeke E., Mallow B. K. Study protocol: mobile improvement of self-management ability through rural technology (mI SMART) SpringerPlus. 2015;4(1, article 423) doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1209-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mallow J. A., Theeke L. A., Walls R., Theeke E., Mallow B. K. Part A: the development of mI SMART, a nurse-led technology intervention for multiple chronic conditions. Open Journal of Nursing. 2016;6(4):303–308. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2016.64031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources