[Are Visual Field Defects Reversible? - Visual Rehabilitation with Brains]
- PMID: 27504612
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104588
[Are Visual Field Defects Reversible? - Visual Rehabilitation with Brains]
Abstract
Visual field defects are considered irreversible because the retina and optic nerve do not regenerate. Nevertheless, there is some potential for recovery of the visual fields. This can be accomplished by the brain, which analyses and interprets visual information and is able to amplify residual signals through neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change its own functional architecture by modulating synaptic efficacy. This is actually the neurobiological basis of normal learning. Plasticity is maintained throughout life and can be induced by repetitively stimulating (training) brain circuits. The question now arises as to how plasticity can be utilised to activate residual vision for the treatment of visual field loss. Just as in neurorehabilitation, visual field defects can be modulated by post-lesion plasticity to improve vision in glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy or optic neuropathy. Because almost all patients have some residual vision, the goal is to strengthen residual capacities by enhancing synaptic efficacy. New treatment paradigms have been tested in clinical studies, including vision restoration training and non-invasive alternating current stimulation. While vision training is a behavioural task to selectively stimulate "relative defects" with daily vision exercises for the duration of 6 months, treatment with alternating current stimulation (30 min. daily for 10 days) activates and synchronises the entire retina and brain. Though full restoration of vision is not possible, such treatments improve vision, both subjectively and objectively. This includes visual field enlargements, improved acuity and reaction time, improved orientation and vision related quality of life. About 70 % of the patients respond to the therapies and there are no serious adverse events. Physiological studies of the effect of alternating current stimulation using EEG and fMRI reveal massive local and global changes in the brain. These include local activation of the visual cortex and global reorganisation of neuronal brain networks. Because modulation of neuroplasticity can strengthen residual vision, the brain deserves a better reputation in ophthalmology for its role in visual rehabilitation. For patients, there is now more light at the end of the tunnel, because vision loss in some areas of the visual field defect is indeed reversible.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Similar articles
-
Reversibility of visual field defects through induction of brain plasticity: vision restoration, recovery and rehabilitation using alternating current stimulation.Neural Regen Res. 2020 Oct;15(10):1799-1806. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.280302. Neural Regen Res. 2020. PMID: 32246620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vision restoration training for glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 1;132(4):381-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7963. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24504128 Clinical Trial.
-
Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0156134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156134. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27355577 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Residual vision activation and the brain-eye-vascular triad: Dysregulation, plasticity and restoration in low vision and blindness - a review.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(6):767-791. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180880. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30412515 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: the "residual vision activation theory".Prog Brain Res. 2011;192:199-262. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0. Prog Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21763527 Review.
Cited by
-
Placebo effect after visual restitution training: no eye-tracking controlled perimetric improvement after visual border stimulation in late subacute and chronic visual field defects after stroke.Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1114718. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1114718. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37456634 Free PMC article.
-
Case report: Beneficial effects of visual cortex tDCS stimulation combined with visual training in patients with visual field defects.Front Neurol. 2024 Jan 24;15:1344348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1344348. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38327623 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical