Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;35(8):781-792.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000384.

Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review

Susan J Blalock  1 , Valerie F Reyna  2
Affiliations
Review

Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review

Susan J Blalock et al. Health Psychol. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Fuzzy-trace theory is a dual-process model of memory, reasoning, judgment, and decision making that contrasts with traditional expectancy-value approaches. We review the literature applying fuzzy-trace theory to health with 3 aims: evaluating whether the theory's basic distinctions have been validated empirically in the domain of health; determining whether these distinctions are useful in assessing, explaining, and predicting health-related psychological processes; and determining whether the theory can be used to improve health judgments, decisions, or behaviors, especially compared to other approaches.

Method: We conducted a literature review using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science to identify empirical peer-reviewed papers that applied fuzzy-trace theory, or central constructs of the theory, to investigate health judgments, decisions, or behaviors.

Results: Seventy nine studies (updated total is 94 studies; see Supplemental materials) were identified, over half published since 2012, spanning a wide variety of conditions and populations. Study findings supported the prediction that verbatim and gist representations are distinct constructs that can be retrieved independently using different cues. Although gist-based reasoning was usually associated with improved judgment and decision making, 4 sources of bias that can impair gist reasoning were identified. Finally, promising findings were reported from intervention studies that used fuzzy-trace theory to improve decision making and decrease unhealthy risk taking.

Conclusions: Despite large gaps in the literature, most studies supported all 3 aims. By focusing on basic psychological processes that underlie judgment and decision making, fuzzy-trace theory provides insights into how individuals make decisions involving health risks and suggests innovative intervention approaches to improve health outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adam MB, Reyna VF. Coherence and correspondence criteria for rationality: Experts’ estimation of risks of sexually transmitted infections. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2005;18:169–186. http://dx.doi:10.1002/bdm.493. - DOI
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179–211.
    1. Anand R, Chapman SB, Rackley A, Keebler M, Zientz J, Hart J. Gist reasoning training in cognitively normal seniors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2011;26:961–986. http://dx.doi:10.1002/gps.2633. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baghal T. The measurement of risk perceptions: The case of smoking. Journal of Risk Research. 2011;14(3):351–364. http://dx.doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.541559. - DOI
    1. Bigman CA. Social comparison framinig in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk. Health Communication. 2014;39(3):267–280. - PMC - PubMed