Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;55(12):1107-12.
doi: 10.1177/0009922816662863. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

Care-Seeking Behavior After Notification Among Young Women With Recurrent Sexually Transmitted Infections After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Affiliations

Care-Seeking Behavior After Notification Among Young Women With Recurrent Sexually Transmitted Infections After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Arlene M Butz et al. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objective To determine the level of nurse case management and outreach required to notify young women with sexually transmitted infection (STI) positive test results after pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and percent seeking treatment.

Methods: Participants (N = 153) were enrolled in a clinical trial of young women diagnosed with PID and followed for 3 months for recurrent STIs. Vaginal swabs were obtained at 1 and 3 months. All participants were notified of positive STIs at 1 and 3 months and treatment arranged. Data were analyzed with logistic regression for comparison of treatment status by number of nurse contacts. Results Over the 3-month period, 59 participants (38.6%) tested positive for one or more STIs and all received notification. Only 50% (19/38) of participants with STI at 1 month and 43% (16/37) at 3 months received treatment. Conclusions Despite the high notification rate of positive test results for young adults with recurrent STIs, many failed to seek treatment.

Keywords: adolescent; nurse case management; pelvic inflammatory disease (PID); sexually transmitted infection (STI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Follow-up and Treatment Status over 90 Day Study Period

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trent M, Chung SE, Forrest L, Ellen JM. Subsequent sexually transmitted infection after outpatient treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(11):1022–1025. - PubMed
    1. Trent M, Haggerty CI, Jennings JM, Lee s, Bass DC, Ness R. Adverse adolescent reproductive health outcomes after pelvic inflammatory disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(1):49–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Westrom L. Effects of pelvic inflammatory disease on fertility. Venereology. 1995;8:219–222. - PubMed
    1. Goyal M, Hersh A, Luan X, Localio R, Trent M, Zaoutis T. National Trends in Pelvic Inflammatory disease among adolescents in the emergency department. J Adolescent Health. 2013;53:249–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Workowski KA, Berman S. Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Dec 17;:1–10. (RR-12) Erratum in: MMWR Recomm Rep 2011 Jan 14;60 (1)18. Dosage error in article text. - PubMed

MeSH terms