Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 May-Aug;3(2):93-6.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1060. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

Antibacterial Properties of Fluoride Releasing Glass lonomer Cements (GICs) and Pit and Fissure Sealants on Streptococcus Mutans

Affiliations
Review

Antibacterial Properties of Fluoride Releasing Glass lonomer Cements (GICs) and Pit and Fissure Sealants on Streptococcus Mutans

Mahesh Kumar M et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 May-Aug.

Abstract

Title: Antibacterial properties of fluoride releasing glass Ionomer cements (GICs) and pit and fissure sealants on Streptococcus mutans.

Background: Occlusal pit and fissures are the most susceptible sites for dental caries. The clinical effectiveness of GICs and fissure sealants in preventing caries is well-documented, but there is some concern about bacteria left beneath sealants.

Objective: (1) Study the antibacterial activity of GICs and pit and fissure sealants. (2) Compare between these materials.

Methodology: GICs (Fuji IX GP and Ketac molar) and pit and fissure sealants (Teethmate-F1 and Helioseal-F ). The strains was grown in the Brain Heart Infusion broth and was incubated anaerobically for 18 hours at 37°C and subcultured in MSB agar.Four wells measuring 5 mm diameter was prepared on each agar plate and the prepared materials was placed and further incubated anaerobically for 48 hours at 37°C. The zone of inhibition was measured.

Results: All the materials tested showed antibacterial properties to varying levels except; among pit and fissure sealants it is Teethmate-F which showed more antibacterial property.

Conclusion: Teethmate-F1 sealant showed more antibacterial property compared to Fuji IX and Ketac molar. Helioseal-F did not show any antibacterial property.

Keywords: Antibacterial property; Streptococcus mutans.; fluoride release; glass ionomer cements; pit and fissure sealants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graph I
Graph I
Antibacterial activity of different materials
Graph II
Graph II
Antibacterial activity between Ketac molar and Fuji IX GP
Graph III
Graph III
Antibacterial activity between Teethmate-F1 and Helioseal-F

References

    1. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F. Antibacterial activity of fluoride release sealants on mutants streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996;20(2):109–111. - PubMed
    1. Handelman SL, Washburn F, Wopperer P. Two-year report of sealant effect on bacteria in dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976 Nov;93(5):967–970. - PubMed
    1. Menon Preetha V, Shashikiran ND, Reddy VV. Comparison of antibacterial properties of two fluoride-releasing and a non-fluoride releasing pit and fissure sealants. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007 Jul-Sep;25(3):133–136. - PubMed
    1. Going RE, Loesche WJ, Grainger DA, Syed SA. The viability of microorganisms in carious lesions five years after covering with a fissure sealants. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978 Sep;97(3):455–462. - PubMed
    1. Herrera M, Castillo A, Baca P, Carrion P. Antibacterial activity of glass ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms. Oper Dent. 1999 Sep-Oct;24(5):286–291. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources