Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;45(1):e105-e110.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002023.

Targeted Consent for Research on Standard of Care Interventions in the Emergency Setting

Affiliations

Targeted Consent for Research on Standard of Care Interventions in the Emergency Setting

David Wendler et al. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: There has been significant debate over what consent process, if any, should be used for clinical trials that compare two or more interventions within the standard of care. Some claim that all clinical trials should obtain in-depth research consent because they use subjects to obtain data for the benefit of future patients. Others argue that clinical trials that are limited to interventions within the standard of care do not need to obtain research consent at all. Settling this debate is especially challenging in the emergency setting. The potential for significant morbidity and mortality provides a strong reason to obtain research consent for standard-of-care trials in the emergency setting. Yet, the emergency setting also introduces significant barriers to traditional in-depth research consent. The present article considers to what extent a targeted consent process can resolve these tensions.

Data synthesis: We first identified the ethical goals that are promoted by obtaining consent for standard-of-care research and the barriers to obtaining consent that arise in the emergency setting. We then evaluated whether, despite the barriers, it is possible to develop a targeted consent process that promotes the goals for consent in the context of standard-of-care trials.

Conclusions: Targeted consent offers an ethically appropriate way to obtain consent for many standard-of-care trials in the emergency setting. For studies subject to U.S. regulations, and those subject to other regulations that include similar consent requirements, targeted consent's verbal disclosure and written form provide a way to satisfy research regulations without blocking valuable studies. For trials that qualify for a waiver of the consent requirements, targeted consent's verbal disclosure is preferable to waiving consent, provided a slight delay is consistent with appropriate care, and there is a capacitated patient or surrogate available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No author has any conflicts of interest to report. Dr. Silbergleit disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1587–1597. - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration. [September 25, 2015];Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research. Title 21, Section 50.24. Available online at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?fr....
    1. Department of Health and Human Services. [September 25, 2015];Code of Federal Regulations. title 45, part 46.116. Available online at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.
    1. Lantos JD, Wendler D, Septimus E, Wahba S, Madigan R, Bliss G. Considerations in the evaluation and determination of minimal risk in pragmatic clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2015;12:485–493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287–1296. - PubMed