Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 6;8(8):211.
doi: 10.3390/v8080211.

Hepatitis E Seroprevalence in Europe: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Hepatitis E Seroprevalence in Europe: A Meta-Analysis

Johannes Hartl et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

There have been large numbers of studies on anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence in Europe, however, the results of these studies have produced high variability of seroprevalence rates, making interpretation increasingly problematic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a clearer understanding of anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence in Europe and identify risk groups for HEV exposure by a meta-analysis of published studies.

Methods: All European HEV-seroprevalence studies from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Data were stratified by assay, geographical location, and patient cohort (general population, patients with HIV, solid-organ transplant recipients, chronic liver disease patients, and individuals in contact with swine/wild animals). Data were pooled using a mixed-effects model.

Results: Four hundred thirty-two studies were initially identified, of which 73 studies were included in the analysis. Seroprevalence estimates ranged from 0.6% to 52.5%, increased with age, but were unrelated to gender. General population seroprevalence varied depending on assays: Wantai (WT): 17%, Mikrogen (MG): 10%, MP-diagnostics (MP): 7%, DiaPro: 4%, Abbott 2%. The WT assay reported significantly higher seroprevalence rates across all cohorts (p < 0.001). Individuals in contact with swine/wild animals had significantly higher seroprevalence rates than the general population, irrespective of assay (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between any other cohorts. The highest seroprevalence was observed in France (WT: 32%, MP: 16%) the lowest in Italy (WT: 7.5%, MP 0.9%). Seroprevalence varied between and within countries. The observed heterogeneity was attributed to geographical region (23%), assay employed (23%) and study cohort (7%).

Conclusion: Seroprevalcence rates primarily depend on the seroassy that is used, followed by the geographical region and study cohort. Seroprevalence is higher in individuals exposed to swine and/or wild animals, and increases with age.

Keywords: Europe; anti-HEV IgG; assay; developing countries; genotype 3; hepatitis E; seroprevalence; serosurvey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search algorithm for the anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relationship between anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence rates and the assay employed in different study cohorts. The difference between Wantai (WT) vs. Mikrogen (MG) and WT vs. MP was statistically significant after adjusting for study cohort (WT vs. MG: p < 0.05; WT vs. MP: p < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence rates in the general population dependent on the used seroassay; (B) comparison of estimated seroprevalence rates adjusted for patient cohort. Patient cohorts from left to right: general population, liver diseases, HIV infections, transplant recipients, swine/wild animal contact (farmers, veterinarians, slaughterhouse workers, forestry workers); (C) calculated anti-HEV seroprevalence in different European countries. Exact seroprevalence rates are displayed in Table 3; and (D) amount of heterogeneity explained by used seroassay, study cohort, and geographical location.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A diagrammatic representation of the distribution of the number of sows in the European Union [44].

References

    1. Kamar N., Bendall R., Legrand-Abravanel F., Xia N.S., Ijaz S., Izopet J., Dalton H.R. Hepatitis E. Lancet. 2012;379:2477–2488. - PubMed
    1. Rein D.B., Stevens G.A., Theaker J., Wittenborn J.S., Wiersma S.T. The global burden of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 and 2 in 2005. Hepatology. 2012;55:988–997. doi: 10.1002/hep.25505. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalton H.R., Bendall R., Ijaz S., Banks M. Hepatitis E: An emerging infection in developed countries. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2008;8:698–709. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70255-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalton H.R., Stableforth W., Hazeldine S., Thurairajah P., Ramnarace R., Warshow U., Ijaz S., Ellis V., Bendall R. Autochthonous hepatitis E in Southwest England: A comparison with hepatitis A. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008;27:579–585. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0480-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamar N., Selves J., Mansuy J.M., Ouezzani L., Peron J.M., Guitard J., Cointault O., Esposito L., Abravanel F., Danjoux M., Durand D., Vinel J.P., Izopet J., Rostaing L. Hepatitis E virus and chronic hepatitis in organ-transplant recipients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:811–817. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706992. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources