Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Sep;41(9):1831-1837.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study

Sebastian P Boelch et al. Int Orthop. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Treating acetabular fractures with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) may lead to poorer outcomes in older patients. As data for osteoporotic acetabular fractures are limited, we compared primary total hip replacement (THR) with ORIF for treating osteoporotic acetabular fractures, including those with posterior column instability.

Methods: All patients with osteoporotic acetabular fractures, treated with ORIF or primary THR from 2005 to 2015, were assessed retrospectively for clinical and radiologic outcomes. Indication criteria for selecting primary THR were evaluated.

Results: Twenty-three patients were treated with ORIF and nine with primary THR (performed with an anti-protrusion cage). If the posterior column was unstable, THR was combined with posterior column bridge plating. Indications for THR were the presence of a comminuted fracture pattern, approach-related risk factors for ORIF, and mobilization issues. Biomechanical reconstruction was acceptable with THR. Acetabular component loosening was observed only once. Secondary THR was indicated in 45 % of the ORIF cases.

Discussion: ORIF for acetabular fracture in older patients is unsatisfactory and may be even worse for osteoporotic fractures. Immobilization for long-term restricted weight bearing after ORIF is hazardous. Primary THR may enable early post-operative full weight-bearing. Various techniques, affording fixation of the unstable acetabular columns, are described. In THR with an anti-protrusion cage, only dorsal column instability needs to be addressed.

Conclusion: The described technique achieved sufficient acetabular component stability. Primary THR with an anti-protrusion cage is an advantageous option to ORIF and should be strongly considered for osteoporotic acetabular fractures.

Keywords: Acetabulum fracture; Burch–Schneider anti-protrusion cage; Low-energy trauma; Open reduction and internal fixation; Osteoporosis; Total hip replacement/arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Jan;14(1):60-4 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):776-82 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;28(6):330-7 - PubMed
    1. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979 Oct;95(1-2):47-9 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 May;27(5):256-61 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources