Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;60(7):496-8.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.186021.

A comparative study of landmark-based topographic method versus the formula method for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian central venous catheters

Tejesh C Anandaswamy  1 , Vinay Marulasiddappa  2
Affiliations

A comparative study of landmark-based topographic method versus the formula method for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian central venous catheters

Tejesh C Anandaswamy et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: Subclavian central venous catheterisation (CVC) is employed in critically ill patients requiring long-term central venous access. There is no gold standard for estimating their depth of insertion. In this study, we compared the landmark topographic method with the formula technique for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian CVCs.

Methods: Two hundred and sixty patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit requiring subclavian CVC were randomly assigned to either topographic method or formula method (130 in each group). Catheter tip position in relation to the carina was measured on a post-procedure chest X-ray. The primary endpoint was the need for catheter repositioning. Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test was performed for statistical analysis using SPSS for windows version 18.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Results: Nearly, half the catheters positioned by both the methods were situated >1 cm below the carina and required repositioning.

Conclusion: Both the techniques were not effective in estimating the approximate depth of insertion of right subclavian CVCs.

Keywords: Central venous catheter tip; formula method; topographic method.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Booth SA, Norton B, Mulvey DA. Central venous catheterization and fatal cardiac tamponade. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:298–302. - PubMed
    1. Kim MC, Kim KS, Choi YK, Kim DS, Kwon MI, Sung JK, et al. An estimation of right- and left-sided central venous catheter insertion depth using measurement of surface landmarks along the course of central veins. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1371–4. - PubMed
    1. Peres PW. Positioning central venous catheters – A prospective survey. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990;18:536–9. - PubMed
    1. Albrecht K, Nave H, Breitmeier D, Panning B, Tröger HD. Applied anatomy of the superior vena cava-the carina as a landmark to guide central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:75–7. - PubMed
    1. Ryu HG, Bahk JH, Kim JT, Lee JH. Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:225–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources