Rare problems with RhD immunoglobulin for postnatal prophylaxis after large fetomaternal haemorrhage
- PMID: 27512480
- PMCID: PMC4935048
- DOI: 10.1177/1753495X15597631
Rare problems with RhD immunoglobulin for postnatal prophylaxis after large fetomaternal haemorrhage
Abstract
We report a case of unusually large fetomaternal haemorrhage in a RhD- patient; of symptomatic non-sustained haemolysis of fetal red cells in the maternal circulation with infusion of intravenous high-dose RhD immunoglobulin; and of a failure to prevent RhD alloimmunisation. The haemolytic reaction is not previously reported in this patient group and we suggest would be limited to patients where the number of fetal red cells in the circulation is high. We advocate caution in treatment and spaced dosing of RhD immunoglobulin where the required dose is high, and refer readers to the WinRhoSDF™ RhD immunoglobulin product information for their updated dosing recommendations. There is a need for better understanding of pathophysiology and RhD immunoglobulin effects, to further reduce alloimmunisation rates, and we support the reporting of prophylaxis failures to haemovigilance programmes as is in place in the United Kingdom.
Keywords: Haematology; haemorrhage; maternal–fetal medicine; perinatal medicine.
Similar articles
-
Clinical practices and outcomes of RhD immunoglobulin prophylaxis following large-volume fetomaternal haemorrhage in Queensland, Australia.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;61(2):205-212. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13226. Epub 2020 Aug 12. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021. PMID: 32789858
-
[Possibility to identify fetomaternal haemorrhage].Ceska Gynekol. 2010 Oct;75(5):443-6. Ceska Gynekol. 2010. PMID: 21374922 Czech.
-
The scientific basis of antenatal prophylaxis.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;105 Suppl 18:11-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10286.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9863973 Review.
-
Misinterpretation of blood group and antibody screen leading to serious errors in RhD immunoglobulin administration: A report on first two years of data from Serious Transfusion Incident Reporting program.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;59(1):161-164. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12889. Epub 2018 Sep 5. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019. PMID: 30187454
-
RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn.Blood Rev. 2000 Mar;14(1):44-61. doi: 10.1054/blre.1999.0123. Blood Rev. 2000. PMID: 10805260 Review.
Cited by
-
Overview of detection methods of fetomaternal haemorrhage.Front Physiol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1445757. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1445757. eCollection 2025. Front Physiol. 2025. PMID: 40292007 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Davies J, Chant R, Simpson S, et al. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis – is the protection adequate? Transfus Med 2011; 21: 421–426. - PubMed
-
- Guidelines on the prophylactic use of Rh D immunoglobulin (anti-D) in obstetrics. National Blood Authority. 2003. Approved by the NHMRC.
-
- Crowther CA, Middleton P, McBain RD. Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD000020–CD000020. - PubMed
-
- Bowman J. Thirty-five years of Rh prophylaxis. Commentary. Transfusion 2003; 43: 1661–1666. - PubMed
-
- de Almeida V, Bowman JM. Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage: Manitoba experience. J Obstetr Gynecol 1994; 83(3): 323–328. . - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources