Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II)
- PMID: 2751471
- DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020053028
Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II)
Abstract
The Lens Opacities Classification System, version II (LOCS II), uses a set of colored slit-lamp and retroillumination transparencies to grade different degrees of nuclear, cortical, and subcapsular cataract. The system uses four nuclear standards for grading nuclear opalescence and color, five cortical standards, and four subcapsular standards. The LOCS II can be used to grade patients' cataracts at the slit lamp or to grade slit-lamp and retroillumination photographs; it is easy to learn and can be applied consistently by different observers. We obtained very good interobserver reproducibility of the clinical gradings at the slit lamp, excellent intraobserver reproducibility, very good to excellent interobserver reproducibility of photographic gradings, and good agreement between clinical and photographic gradings. The LOCS II is potentially useful for both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of cataract.
Comment in
-
Methods of clinical cataract grading: two systems compared.Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Sep;108(9):1209-10. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070110025006. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990. PMID: 2400338 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Suitability of slit lamp retroillumination photographs for classifying cataracts according to 'Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II)'.Curr Eye Res. 1992 Oct;11(10):971-9. doi: 10.3109/02713689209033495. Curr Eye Res. 1992. PMID: 1451528
-
The effect of cataract severity and morphology on the reliability of the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II).Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Jul;32(8):2400-3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991. PMID: 2071351
-
An independent evaluation of the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). The Italian-American Cataract Study Group.Ophthalmology. 1989 May;96(5):611-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32841-7. Ophthalmology. 1989. PMID: 2748117
-
Considerations in the subjective assessment of cataract.Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Nov;70(11):880-5. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199311000-00004. Optom Vis Sci. 1993. PMID: 8302523 Review.
-
The objective assessment of cataract.Eye (Lond). 1987;1 ( Pt 2):234-46. doi: 10.1038/eye.1987.43. Eye (Lond). 1987. PMID: 3308527 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of advanced technology in the detection of sight-threatening eye disease in a UK community setting.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 4;4(1):e000347. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000347. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31909190 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative Alterations on Corneal Endothelial Cell Morphometry and Hexagonality After Cataract Surgery.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 29;15:4847-4853. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S338001. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 35002220 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;62(1):55-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.126182. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24492502 Free PMC article.
-
Loss of contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with LOCS II classified cataracts.Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.7. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993. PMID: 8435406 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of visual function in choroidal neovascularization with scanning laser microperimetry and simultaneous indocyanine green angiography.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;234(10):612-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00185293. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996. PMID: 8897052
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical